OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 04:39


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2017, 09:49 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
I had a month without TT-league, so I tried out some LPs in 1.0mm (red), all on a JSH with a brand new Donic Bluefire JP02 2.0 (black) on FH.

First LP was Donic Akkadi L1 1mm. Played only 15 minutes with it. Simply too fast and a lack of grip. Didn’t like it, could hardly play with it close to the table. Chopping also difficult as I recall it correctly. Simply not what I’m looking for. Never played so short with a rubber.

Second was Joola Octopus 1mm. This rubber is slower than my Donic Spike and Curl P1r. Feels grippier then both. I would say this is the most grippy and slow LP I have tried so far. Playing with it is quite easy, lots of control close to the table, pushing is almost like with inverted, chopping is with a lot of control, attacking goes pretty well because of the great grip. But.. I didn’t win matches with it. People who thought my chops with Spike or P1r were deceptive or carried backspin, said it was quite easy to play against the Octopus, maybe because they had plenty of time to react to it.

Third was DHS Cloud & Fog III 1mm. The pimples bend easily, sponge is softer then Curl P1r, softer than Spike P1 but harder than CurlP4/FLIII. Funny, this rubber has the speed of the Akkadi L1 but the grip of the Octopus . That combination seems to work for me! After an hour of testing, I won against three lightly lower ranked players (~2100 usatt). I think the rubber grips the ball so well because the sponge is softer than what I’m used to, but it isn’t slower (like FLIII).. On the contrary! The short game (esp. pushing backspin, blocking is not the strength of this rubber) is very easy and also lifting the ball and attacking (looping-like movements) are easy. Now, chopping is a challenge when you are used to Curl P1r or Spike P1. Because of the speed, it is almost impossible to get the ball on the table with a long chopping stroke. But when you chop with a short movement (or almost no movement), the ball catapults fast and deep and troubles the opponent. While my chops with Spike P1 were often in the middle area of the table, my chops seem to be deeper now and that could be a good thing.

To be continued! Questions or other experiences are welcome!

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 


Don't want to see this advertisement? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!

PostPosted: 05 Jan 2017, 14:43 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33353
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2760 times
Been thanked: 1550 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
A really good test, I'm reading with interest Pipsy! :up:

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2017, 16:32 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 17:01
Posts: 605
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 132 times
Blade: Sanwei F3 Pro (=TB ALC)
FH: Tibhar MX-D max
BH: Hellfire X/Dtecs ox
I played one tournament with C&F 1.0 (Spinlord ultra carbon def blade) with little practise. It was quite good and I liked it some ways, but in the end, I did more mistakes in the table game than with my usual set up. It's fastish rubber with Dtecs like feeling.

I think it's a bit of a question of safe against dangerous for me - which is better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2017, 22:21 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
From what I recall, I had a lot more difficulties controling the short game with D'tecs than with C&F. I think C&F has more grip and less catapult than D'tecs.

Played again yesterday and feeling was good, won three out of four matches. I think I will stick to it the first 2-3 league matches and then evaluate again...

Roy wrote:
I played one tournament with C&F 1.0 (Spinlord ultra carbon def blade) with little practise. It was quite good and I liked it some ways, but in the end, I did more mistakes in the table game than with my usual set up. It's fastish rubber with Dtecs like feeling.

I think it's a bit of a question of safe against dangerous for me - which is better.

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jan 2017, 02:16 
Offline
Joo Too
Joo Too
User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2008, 18:31
Posts: 4075
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 1213 times
Been thanked: 583 times
Blade: BTY Joo Se Hyuk ST
FH: DHS Hurricane 3-50 soft R
BH: TSP P1-R 1,5 B
I played with Octopus for a short period of time and C&F III for +-3 years. Both 1.0mm, Octopus red en C&F III black. I can confirm the easiness of playing against Octopus. C&F III is a tamed version of DTecs: a bit slower and a bit grippier. Still a nasty pip to play against. I found it has it's limits in chopping for the amount of BS that can be created. Of course I wasn't as good of chopper then than I am now, so who knows what my ruling would be today.

_________________
There's always stuff to improve!

My blog on being a LP defender beyond 2000 USATT and the pips discrimination that comes along with that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 07 Jan 2017, 21:00 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
Maybe you should try it again? :rock:
Birding&TT has also ordered a C&FIII...

Lorre wrote:
I played with Octopus for a short period of time and C&F III for +-3 years. Both 1.0mm, Octopus red en C&F III black. I can confirm the easiness of playing against Octopus. C&F III is a tamed version of DTecs: a bit slower and a bit grippier. Still a nasty pip to play against. I found it has it's limits in chopping for the amount of BS that can be created. Of course I wasn't as good of chopper then than I am now, so who knows what my ruling would be today.

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2017, 03:10 
Offline
Joo Too
Joo Too
User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2008, 18:31
Posts: 4075
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 1213 times
Been thanked: 583 times
Blade: BTY Joo Se Hyuk ST
FH: DHS Hurricane 3-50 soft R
BH: TSP P1-R 1,5 B
Pipsy wrote:
Maybe you should try it again? :rock:
Birding&TT has also ordered a C&FIII...


I'd try it in the mid season. Now I'm already playing competition again (starting next Tuesday) and I'm very fond of my P1-R.

_________________
There's always stuff to improve!

My blog on being a LP defender beyond 2000 USATT and the pips discrimination that comes along with that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2017, 03:28 
Offline
LP Collector
LP Collector
User avatar

Joined: 01 Aug 2012, 06:57
Posts: 2289
Location: Hampshire, UK
Has thanked: 303 times
Been thanked: 333 times
Blade: Yaska Sweden Classic
FH: 802 OX
BH: DHS C8 OX
Every dog has its day. Every LP has its burst of fashionability. I wonder how many ooak members are still using Pogo?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Yasaka Sweden Classic | 802 OX | C8 OX
Check out my blog - LordCope's Latest Learning Log - 10+ years of accumulate mistakes!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2017, 05:45 
Offline
Senior member
User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2016, 13:22
Posts: 138
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 20 times
Blade: Gionnis carb def
FH: H3-50
BH: Talon
So is C&FIII like D.tecs in OX?
In what little reading I've done, it's not considered very useful as a pushblock style rubber.

_________________
"When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2017, 18:39 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 17:01
Posts: 605
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 132 times
Blade: Sanwei F3 Pro (=TB ALC)
FH: Tibhar MX-D max
BH: Hellfire X/Dtecs ox
Ehimle wrote:
So is C&FIII like D.tecs in OX?
In what little reading I've done, it's not considered very useful as a pushblock style rubber.

I have played with both. C&F ox is not like Dtecs ox, because C&F has thick base. C&F ox is quite easy to play, but for me it doesn't give much spin, reversal or disturbance. C&F is for active table plays and maybe bump shots are it's streght.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2017, 19:14 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 17 Feb 2015, 08:29
Posts: 537
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 63 times
Blade: Butterfly Defence II
FH: Tibhar Evolution MX-P 2.2
BH: TSP Curl P1r 0.5mm
Roy wrote:
Ehimle wrote:
So is C&FIII like D.tecs in OX?
In what little reading I've done, it's not considered very useful as a pushblock style rubber.

I have played with both. C&F ox is not like Dtecs ox, because C&F has thick base. C&F ox is quite easy to play, but for me it doesn't give much spin, reversal or disturbance. C&F is for active table plays and maybe bump shots are it's streght.

i agree
cf3 is fast, with low trajectory. but spin reversal or disturbance isnt on level as dtecs has . (ofc comparing both in OX)

_________________
Butterfly Defence II / Victas Curl P1V 0.5mm / Tibhar Evolution MX-P 2.0mm -185g


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2017, 23:00 
Offline
Joo Too
Joo Too
User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2008, 18:31
Posts: 4075
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 1213 times
Been thanked: 583 times
Blade: BTY Joo Se Hyuk ST
FH: DHS Hurricane 3-50 soft R
BH: TSP P1-R 1,5 B
I was taking about C&F III and DTecs both with sponge.

_________________
There's always stuff to improve!

My blog on being a LP defender beyond 2000 USATT and the pips discrimination that comes along with that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2017, 01:38 
Offline
Senior member
User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2016, 13:22
Posts: 138
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 20 times
Blade: Gionnis carb def
FH: H3-50
BH: Talon
Thanks everyone on letting me know the differences in ox.
This last year there was a video of a NA Tournament with a chopper who us d c&f III very effectively especially with pushes and bumps on service returns.

_________________
"When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2017, 03:11 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 17 Feb 2015, 08:29
Posts: 537
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 63 times
Blade: Butterfly Defence II
FH: Tibhar Evolution MX-P 2.2
BH: TSP Curl P1r 0.5mm
Ehimle wrote:
Thanks everyone on letting me know the differences in ox.
This last year there was a video of a NA Tournament with a chopper who us d c&f III very effectively especially with pushes and bumps on service returns.

Jian Li

_________________
Butterfly Defence II / Victas Curl P1V 0.5mm / Tibhar Evolution MX-P 2.0mm -185g


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2017, 20:57 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
Thanks for the reference! From the strokes he does and the service reception, it seems to me that he uses OX

viewtopic.php?t=29912&p=317987


_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next




All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sk123 and 358 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group