OOAK Table Tennis Forum

I am going for Nittaku Best Anti because I can chop (a bit) with it, and forehand would be Tibhar Evolution MX-S, but I am not sure about the blade. I prefer Stiga because of the Legend handle (Wide Flared). Which of the following do you suggest?

Stiga Allround Classic Carbon
Stiga Allround Wood NCT
Stiga Allround CR - WRB

i use best anti in 1.8 and its amazing for blocking and chopping.i use a defplay.its also good with an all minus grubba pro.
im sure it will be ideal with any of your blades.if too fast you can always move down to a slower blade.what country do you live in?

_________________
"If you see an attack on you or your sponsor, you're a poor sausage, no more."

Thank you for your response. I am in India.

After I posted the question, I read about Dr. Neubauer Hercules and Der Materialspezialist Spinhunter and found them to be good. Now I am even more confused

it all depends on your game for choice of blade.i like to passive block close to the table and also chop away from the table with anti.i also like to passive block on the f/h and do the odd drive.for blocking heavy loops the defplay blade is very good when used with best anti.
i use short pips on the forehand-its very confusing and i get my stuff cheap from e bay and sell on what i dont like

_________________
"If you see an attack on you or your sponsor, you're a poor sausage, no more."

Hi Peterpong,

Thank you for your feedback? I decided to go with Stiga Allround CR - WRB and Nittaku Best anti on BH.

However, I am still unable to decide between 1.2 mm and 1.8 mm. Could you explain the differences? Which thickness should be used for what purpose -
chop(spin)/block/reversal? Which has better control?

Thank you,

Krishna.

http://www.noppen-test.de/forum/viewtop ... f=6&t=7617
very good thread - use google translate
i have only ever used 1.8 and find it fantastic for blocking and chopping-you can also do backhand drives.

_________________
"If you see an attack on you or your sponsor, you're a poor sausage, no more."

Hi Krishna,
I use the same setup you mentioned. NBA on BH and MX-S for FH. NBA thickness is 1.8 and MX-S is max.
If you are from Hyderabad we can meet and you can check how Nest Anti with 1.8mm plays. I am using BBC Nine blade.

That's good to know. Sorry, I am in B'lore. I will let you know if I visit Hyd. My best wishes.

do you like 1.2 best anti?

_________________
"If you see an attack on you or your sponsor, you're a poor sausage, no more."

It's alright, I use it for an emergency chop else block/push most of the time. I win some, I lose some. I am not certain if I am using it right. So many things I could be wrong about....blade type (right now off+), bat angle for anti rubber play, grip on handle (soft/medium/hard), playing distance from table, watching the ball till contact on blade etc

I ordered a new stiff carbon blade (all+) with 1.2 mm Best Anti and it's on its way. And I hope to work on the issues I mentioned above one step at a time, and by trial and error.

I will keep this post updated on what I find. Thanks for asking.

ALL FROM GERMAN FORUM AND TRANSLATED

the NBA I play for 30 years in 2.0 earlier 2.2.

Have him tested on the Grubba Carbon.
The Grubba Carbon is a wood without feeling.
In my opinion, the station wagon was very bad.

An NBA on a Grubba All + is a dream.
Feeling without end. Play the Kombi for 10 years.
Many years of Landesliga WTTV clearly positive.

Everything goes block, counter, bob. Short shelves and
pseudo top.

The NBA is hardly ever a turnaround.
With the Grubba Carbon, the ball is just
way too long for the block and counter.

Since when are Andro woods more sensitive?
They have been regarded as unfeeling forever.
See, for example, the Core series.


Post subject: Re: Change to Anti Top, material question?contributionPosted: Monday 13 December 2010, 17:38
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Registered: Monday, December 6th 2010, 8:56 pm
Posts: 526
Hello,

to the question sponge strength faster or slower. The
NBA sponge is already relatively damping.
But the wood is very important. Medium hard or hard
wood 2.0. Soft wood rather thin
because otherwise too spongy.
Can always emphasize his great plus
is the simple control in almost all game situations.


Wahni
Post subject: Re: Nittaku Best AnticontributionPosted: Saturday January 24, 2015, 15:36
Offline
Greenhorn

Joined: Saturday, March 20, 2010, 11:30 am
Posts: 15
club: SC Union 08 Lüdinghausen
Series: 1. Kreisklasse
TTR value: 1,490
I am currently playing the NBA (black, 2.0mm) RH (QTTR around 1400, 2nd class NRW).
Gameplay: Mainly block (active and passive) / counter and if there must be long defense.
Actually, I am satisfied with my NBA, supercontrolled, doing what I expect from him. Since I would like to test something in the coming Easter holidays, here is my question: Has ever one of you a change on mittellange Noppe dared? And if so on which and with what success? I love the Neubauer killer.
Greeting Wahni

_________________
Wood: Donic Waldner Senso Carbon
VH: Tibhar Aurus soft 2.1 red
RH: Nittaku Best Anti 2.0 black

So in a nutshell-woods so far found and used on the internet
Donic Waldner Senso Carbon
Donic defplay senso -(reduced head)
butterfly Grubba All +
butterfly grubba pro All -

_________________
"If you see an attack on you or your sponsor, you're a poor sausage, no more."