Would it be an idea to attach numbers to the videos, so we can refer to them more easily when discussing them? There certainly is a lot to say about a lot of them, after watching them and thinking it over...
Eventually, perhaps they should be organized in groups, too; double anti, backhand anti, forehand anti, close to table, mid-distance defence... I am not sure how to categorize exactly yet, but it would make sense to do so, I think. For one thing it would be easier to compare different players using a similar style. For another it would be easier to recognize the essential features of different styles.

Yes, that is it, MNNB! Can you do that?

Right. How do you want it to be categorized? I'd think: categorize by styles: 1. close to the table blocking &pushing (emphasis on anti alone), 2. close to the table blocking & attacking (anti combined with other rubber), 3. mid-distance defense and counter, 4. long-distance defense and retrieve 5. long distance defense and attack. But you'd always get hard to categorize cases...

You have so much players and so much video?

Right. How do you want it to be categorized? I'd think: categorize by styles: 1. close to the table blocking &pushing (emphasis on anti alone), 2. close to the table blocking & attacking (anti combined with other rubber), 3. mid-distance defense and counter, 4. long-distance defense and retrieve 5. long distance defense and attack. But you'd always get hard to categorize cases...

I had already posted this Eric Boggan match in my blog, but it is also very appropriate in this anti tactics study thread as well. He apparently uses a custom version of BFY Super Anti.

We could do it like that, or maybe...
1. Frictionless Anti Play
2. Anti Blocking
3. Anti Attacker
4. Anti Chopping
5. Forehand Anti
6. Double Anti