| OOAK Table Tennis Forum https://ooakforum.com/ |
|
| Surface detail of frictionless anti https://ooakforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=30944 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | 111Iceman111 [ 13 Feb 2017, 21:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Surface detail of frictionless anti |
the thing is, when i switched to anti from lp i thought i have a rubber that will last me 5 years like i heard the anti is lasting...but this one is for sure not that... so on the one side i had DG which was losing it pimples after a month and now i have MB which is losing it properties after a month...i hate that... 
|
|
| Author: | Ragnolo [ 14 Feb 2017, 00:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Surface detail of frictionless anti |
Other consideration... For now plastic balls has a problem, but the situation is better than 1 year ago. When plastic balls was born many people switched from LP to FANTI, coz spin are very very low. Now plastic balls (NITTAKU, DSH, DONIC and others) have a better technology: spin and general comportment is comparable (even if not equal) with cell balls. I think in 1 years the production's optimisation will be totally comparable with old balls; for this i preferred to play with a rubber who give me better solutions than fanti. It's my opinion.. naturally... |
|
| Author: | Robot Blocker [ 24 Jun 2017, 06:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Surface detail of frictionless anti |
hookshot wrote: My Super Anti is 6 years old and just gets better every year.  How have u got on with the poly ball and SA hooky? |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|