OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 22:36


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 386 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 26  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 10:29 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 19:16
Posts: 1400
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 65 times
mynamenotbob wrote:
Velonstrials wrote:
OOAK Forums has a unique selection of people, if we think in a non bias way, you should see that it is going to be a benefit to the wider community of table tennis players, however that does not mean it is fair for those who like the defensive style.

So anyone in a minority is biased?


Apparently so...
Sucks to be a minority, I'll tell you that. :^)


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 10:37 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 06:20
Posts: 370
Location: Australia, Adelaide.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
No, not everyone is biased, it is just easy to enter that state of mind when you are the recipient of the negative affects.

_________________
Please view my blog, viewtopic.php?f=58&t=17571 , all the problems that I face in table tennis, I post on here, and I would very much appreciate it if you give your opinion on the matters.
S#1: Joola Wing Passion Fast, FH: 729 Cream 2.2, BH: 802-40 2.
S#2: Joola Trix Medium, FH: Hurricane 3 Neo 2, BH: 279 FX Lightning 2.2.
S#3: Galaxy 896, , BH: Pro XP 2.FH: Pro XP 2.2
S#4: Senso Waldner Carbon, FH: Apollo I 2.2, BH: Blowfish Plush Short Pimple Tensor.

S#4: Giant Dragon Kris Special, FH: Giant Dragon TaiChi Soft, BH: Giant Dragon Meteorite Soft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 10:49 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 19:16
Posts: 1400
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 65 times
Velonstrials wrote:
No, not everyone is biased, it is just easy to enter that state of mind when you are the recipient of the negative affects.


Just as easy for the majority to say that we are as you stated. It cuts both ways.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 10:51 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 06:20
Posts: 370
Location: Australia, Adelaide.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
I am not trying to criticise anyone, I just felt that after reading the article, it was somewhat of a one sided argument.

_________________
Please view my blog, viewtopic.php?f=58&t=17571 , all the problems that I face in table tennis, I post on here, and I would very much appreciate it if you give your opinion on the matters.
S#1: Joola Wing Passion Fast, FH: 729 Cream 2.2, BH: 802-40 2.
S#2: Joola Trix Medium, FH: Hurricane 3 Neo 2, BH: 279 FX Lightning 2.2.
S#3: Galaxy 896, , BH: Pro XP 2.FH: Pro XP 2.2
S#4: Senso Waldner Carbon, FH: Apollo I 2.2, BH: Blowfish Plush Short Pimple Tensor.

S#4: Giant Dragon Kris Special, FH: Giant Dragon TaiChi Soft, BH: Giant Dragon Meteorite Soft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 10:54 
Offline
Joo Too
Joo Too
User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2008, 18:31
Posts: 4075
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 1213 times
Been thanked: 583 times
Blade: BTY Joo Se Hyuk ST
FH: DHS Hurricane 3-50 soft R
BH: TSP P1-R 1,5 B
Velonstrials wrote:
OOAK Forums has a unique selection of people, if we think in a non bias way, you should see that it is going to be a benefit to the wider community of table tennis players, however that does not mean it is fair for those who like the defensive style.


Velonstrials, can you clarify your statement? How is a less spinny and higher bouncy ball a benefit for a wider community of TT players?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 11:05 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 06:20
Posts: 370
Location: Australia, Adelaide.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
These new characteristics of the ball increase the ease of which the double inverted can counter loop, loop and all basic double inverted strokes, this is mainly due to the higher bounces which places it in an ideal position, and the reduction in speed and spin makes their shots easier in general. As stated by others, this reduces the effectiveness of chopping, spin reversal and other defensive tactics.

_________________
Please view my blog, viewtopic.php?f=58&t=17571 , all the problems that I face in table tennis, I post on here, and I would very much appreciate it if you give your opinion on the matters.
S#1: Joola Wing Passion Fast, FH: 729 Cream 2.2, BH: 802-40 2.
S#2: Joola Trix Medium, FH: Hurricane 3 Neo 2, BH: 279 FX Lightning 2.2.
S#3: Galaxy 896, , BH: Pro XP 2.FH: Pro XP 2.2
S#4: Senso Waldner Carbon, FH: Apollo I 2.2, BH: Blowfish Plush Short Pimple Tensor.

S#4: Giant Dragon Kris Special, FH: Giant Dragon TaiChi Soft, BH: Giant Dragon Meteorite Soft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 11:10 
Offline
Do you feel lucky (young) punk?
Do you feel lucky (young) punk?
User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 12:57
Posts: 5772
Location: USA
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 248 times
Blade: Juic Hinoki One Ply
FH: Tibhar 5Q
BH: Scandal
It would reduce the spin an inverted player can make and that makes a loop harder, it is the spin that brings the loop back down. We need the balls to actually test them befroe any conclusion can be made.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 11:11 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 19:16
Posts: 1400
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 65 times
Velonstrials wrote:
These new characteristics of the ball increase the ease of which the double inverted can counter loop, loop and all basic double inverted strokes, this is mainly due to the higher bounces which places it in an ideal position, and the reduction in speed and spin makes their shots easier in general. As stated by others, this reduces the effectiveness of chopping, spin reversal and other defensive tactics.


So you are effectively saying that Adham knows this all along? If this is true, then he is actually lying again for the benefit of the silent "majority"... Hadn't he repeatedly said this is to benefit defensive players, which happen to be a very small minority, including "us" at OOAK. Why did he do that?


Last edited by roundrobin on 05 Dec 2011, 11:31, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 11:13 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 19:16
Posts: 1400
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 65 times
hookshot wrote:
It would reduce the spin an inverted player can make and that makes a loop harder, it is the spin that brings the loop back down. We need the balls to actually test them befroe any conclusion can be made.


Not necessarily. Tests by Chinese national team players have shown the new plastic ball bounces faster so the dwell time is shorter for loopers. These players can increase dwell time by simply switching to a softer/more elastic blade, and spin at the same amount. Also, some CNT women players who test the new ball using Tenergy style rubbers on their fh have said it's actually easier to spin accurately than the old 40mm ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 11:37 
Offline
Do you feel lucky (young) punk?
Do you feel lucky (young) punk?
User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 12:57
Posts: 5772
Location: USA
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 248 times
Blade: Juic Hinoki One Ply
FH: Tibhar 5Q
BH: Scandal
Haggisv, become famous and rich, be the first supplier to sell the new balls. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 11:45 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 06:20
Posts: 370
Location: Australia, Adelaide.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
There is lots of conflicting evidence, I suspect that it is said to be "better for defenders" just to keep us quite...

_________________
Please view my blog, viewtopic.php?f=58&t=17571 , all the problems that I face in table tennis, I post on here, and I would very much appreciate it if you give your opinion on the matters.
S#1: Joola Wing Passion Fast, FH: 729 Cream 2.2, BH: 802-40 2.
S#2: Joola Trix Medium, FH: Hurricane 3 Neo 2, BH: 279 FX Lightning 2.2.
S#3: Galaxy 896, , BH: Pro XP 2.FH: Pro XP 2.2
S#4: Senso Waldner Carbon, FH: Apollo I 2.2, BH: Blowfish Plush Short Pimple Tensor.

S#4: Giant Dragon Kris Special, FH: Giant Dragon TaiChi Soft, BH: Giant Dragon Meteorite Soft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 12:03 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 19 Nov 2010, 11:50
Posts: 161
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
hookshot wrote:
Haggisv, become famous and rich, be the first supplier to sell the new balls. :D


When that happens haggisv, don't forget that we are you friends ;). Just to be safe, adopt the "just-in-time" method of stocking inventory. You don't want to be caught with excess inventory just in case the ITTF change the rules again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 12:22 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33353
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2760 times
Been thanked: 1550 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
hookshot wrote:
We need the balls to actually test them befroe any conclusion can be made.

Yep I agree! Not worth arguing about guys... we're all on the same side here.

I've asked Samsonov (who chairs the Athletes commission) to hear his view on the testing. I'll ask William Henzel as well, as he's also on that commission.

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 12:50 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 10:22
Posts: 624
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 6 times
haggisv wrote:
I've asked Samsonov (who chairs the Athletes commission) to hear his view on the testing. I'll ask William Henzel as well, as he's also on that commission.


It has just occurred to me. We know, that Samsonov did not test the plastic balls before September 2011. Given he is a top player, no other top player probably tested these balls. So the question is: who the hell did test the balls before the BoD passed their decision? There are only 2 logical possibilities: either the BoD members did it themselves, but then we would have already heard something about it, or NOBODY. So, the conclusion is, they probably voted for something they have no idea about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2011, 12:56 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33353
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2760 times
Been thanked: 1550 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
Adham's answers seems to imply that the balls have not been finalised yet, and that the testing and improvement is a continuing process.

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 386 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 26  Next


Don't want to see this advertisement? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group