| OOAK Table Tennis Forum https://ooakforum.com/ |
|
| Structural contrast of Polyball & seam ball https://ooakforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=23056 |
Page 3 of 3 |
| Author: | Bobs_Your_Uncle [ 03 Jul 2014, 00:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Structural contrast of Polyball & seam ball |
I had a hit with a new Nittaku Seamless ball as I was told and I could not spot any differences from the early poly ball which I very much disliked. I noticed no real differences and played very similarly. The man who let me try the sample was Dave Smythe A.K.A Mr Butterfly as he visits our club to do some business with the treasurer. He had a Nittaku 3 star poly and I had a little hit with it and it did not sound at all broken. It played like a celluloid. Rest assured I think until we do some tests on all these balls and reviews samples in a unbiased manor. We will come to conclusions of the good and bad poly balls. I only hope they don't jack up the prices for the new poly balls or keep the same prices as shipping costs should be a quarter of the original fire proof containment they were held in, but I highly doubt that. |
|
| Author: | zeio [ 04 Jul 2014, 12:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Structural contrast of Polyball & seam ball |
The reason you didn't find any differences is simply because the Nittaku ball is seamed. |
|
| Author: | Baal [ 31 Jul 2014, 04:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Structural contrast of Polyball & seam ball |
The XSF ball was like playing badminton. We need a single ball standard. |
|
| Author: | iskandar taib [ 25 Aug 2014, 01:52 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Structural contrast of Polyball & seam ball |
Judging from the latest posts, things seem to have changed. viewtopic.php?f=9&t=26325 Iskandar |
|
| Author: | Baal [ 27 Aug 2014, 10:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Structural contrast of Polyball & seam ball |
yes, latest versions of XSF balls are much better now. |
|
| Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|