OOAK Table Tennis Forum

Everything about table tennis
Live Table Tennis Videos OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 22 May 2013, 10:12


Don't want to see this advertisement? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 07 Jul 2012, 16:37 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 00:28
Posts: 187
alasam wrote:
nexy wrote:
alasam wrote:
Hi Nexy,

I'm quite intrigued with the choice of name for the Tuvalu and the story behind it. Very eye opening!

When developing the new Tuvalu, were you directed towards long pips with a sponge, OX, or both?
With the Labyrinthos geared towards OX, would the Tuvalu be for sponged LPs?

Regards,
Anthony


Thank you for the nice comment, Anthony.

I designed this blade more oriented toward OX.
But as you might know, long pimple rubbers, whether they are with sponge or not, have a certain character.
And I think Tuvalu works on that on both kinds.

One purchaser in Korea left a very good feedback, who plays traditional defensive way.
He used grass d tecs 1.6mm, and quite satisfied with it.
He told that Tuvalu allow fantastic back hand chopping, as well as outstanding attack.
He was surprised to know that he can become attacker, with his back hand, if he wants.

As for me, I agree with him as a designer, because I can picture how it would work.
But I'm not long pimple player, so my sureness has some limit.
Why don't you try for it?

haggisv is searching for free reveiwer.
You can apply for it.


Thanks for the reply Nexy,

The Tuvalu does seem like a blade within my playing field, seeing that I was taught and only ever played with long pip rubbers on my backhand (not to say I'm a pro in the field; I'm quite far from that level of play :D ). Though I've always played with faster, light blades.

Did the purchaser in Korea mention any opinion when playing near the table? I, myself, play a classic defending game near the table using pushes, blocks, chop blocks, an such. It may be a bit different because I use OX myself, I would love to know how he felt within that area.

I did see haggisv's thread on the blade testing and did apply for myself. I do hope I get lucky enough to be chosen, this blade does seem like a blade I would be fond of and enjoy using and testing out to review. But whether I do or not, I look forward to hearing developments with this blade and others in the future!

Regards,
Anthony


This blade makes good wobling effect plus very stable control for the defender.
Long pimple rubber is not easy to control, but with Tuvalu, you will feel in the different way.
It's specailly good when you are close, or on the table.
I mentioned it's good away from the table, and that meant that this blade is also good away from the table.
So, basically, this blade is desgined for the close or on the table, I can say.


Top
 Profile  
 


Don't want to see this advertisement? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!

PostPosted: 08 Jul 2012, 00:16 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 22:08
Posts: 7
Thanks for the reply again Nexy.
This blade seems more and more interesting as you explain it! I do love blades that are geared for close/on table play :lol:
I can't wait to hear more feedback from other users of the blade. Hope to hear more results soon!

Regards,
Anthony


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Jul 2012, 19:21 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 24962
Location: Adelaide, Australia
NEXY: Just a question about the range of blade weights from one of the testers (and others might be interested too):
Can you advise expected differences in charateristics between the lightest weight (80 gr) of Tuvalu and the heavy weight (97 gr). What makes the weight range so large? Or did you intentionally design it with a range of weights?

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Table Tennis Reviews / Articles | Table Guide | Robot Guide
Re-Impact Blades | Avalox Blade Overview | Table Tennis Robots

My setup: Blade: Re-Impact OOAK Dark Knight | BH: Dtecs OX red | FH: JUIC 999 Turbo 2.0mm blk
Check out my huge 'for sale' thread here | My OOAK Interview


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Jul 2012, 21:04 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2007, 15:49
Posts: 1325
Location: USofA
haggisv wrote:
Just a question about the rang of blade weights nexy from one of the testers (and others might be interested too.

Can you advise expected differences in charateristics bwteen the lightest weight (80 gr) of Tuvalu and the heavy weight (97 gr). What makes the weight range so large? Or did you intentionally design it with a range of weights?


I am always happier with a lighter blade.
tOD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012, 02:47 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 00:28
Posts: 187
haggisv wrote:
NEXY: Just a question about the range of blade weights from one of the testers (and others might be interested too):
Can you advise expected differences in charateristics between the lightest weight (80 gr) of Tuvalu and the heavy weight (97 gr). What makes the weight range so large? Or did you intentionally design it with a range of weights?


Sorry for this late reply.
I've been in Europe for several days not working, so I could not know of this question

The weight range is big because I used different weight balsa woods.
From my experience, specially long pimple users needs big gap in their preference of weight
, because some use OX, which is very light. And some players use heavy rubbers on their forehand side, which affects big on the total weight, due to large head size.
So I tried to present always big gap for long pimple blades.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Jul 2012, 11:19 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 30 Oct 2008, 18:55
Posts: 195
nexy wrote:
haggisv wrote:
NEXY: Just a question about the range of blade weights from one of the testers (and others might be interested too):
Can you advise expected differences in charateristics between the lightest weight (80 gr) of Tuvalu and the heavy weight (97 gr). What makes the weight range so large? Or did you intentionally design it with a range of weights?


Sorry for this late reply.
I've been in Europe for several days not working, so I could not know of this question

The weight range is big because I used different weight balsa woods.
From my experience, specially long pimple users needs big gap in their preference of weight
, because some use OX, which is very light. And some players use heavy rubbers on their forehand side, which affects big on the total weight, due to large head size.
So I tried to present always big gap for long pimple blades.


Thanks for the response.
Understand now the weight difference is because the different balsa weight used.
However, the main question is not answered yet, beside the weight difference, what player can get from the light weight and heavy weight TUVALU.

My guess is the light weight blade will give slower speed and better control. What I want to know is the difference of the speed of the light weight and heavy weight TUVALU, perhaps Mr. Nexy could give comparison of the slowness of both type compared to other defensive blade like Defense Alpha, Defense II, Matsushita, JSH, Joola CWX, Donic Def Play or other blades.

Awaiting this response. I always like your detailed technical aspect of your explanation on each of blade you have created. I am hoping to read those for this Tuvalu.

_________________
Tachi, BH: red Tibhar Grass D.Tecs OX, FH: black Adidas P3 max


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Jul 2012, 01:46 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 00:28
Posts: 187
tobhik wrote:
nexy wrote:
haggisv wrote:
NEXY: Just a question about the range of blade weights from one of the testers (and others might be interested too):
Can you advise expected differences in charateristics between the lightest weight (80 gr) of Tuvalu and the heavy weight (97 gr). What makes the weight range so large? Or did you intentionally design it with a range of weights?


Sorry for this late reply.
I've been in Europe for several days not working, so I could not know of this question

The weight range is big because I used different weight balsa woods.
From my experience, specially long pimple users needs big gap in their preference of weight
, because some use OX, which is very light. And some players use heavy rubbers on their forehand side, which affects big on the total weight, due to large head size.
So I tried to present always big gap for long pimple blades.


Thanks for the response.
Understand now the weight difference is because the different balsa weight used.
However, the main question is not answered yet, beside the weight difference, what player can get from the light weight and heavy weight TUVALU.

My guess is the light weight blade will give slower speed and better control. What I want to know is the difference of the speed of the light weight and heavy weight TUVALU, perhaps Mr. Nexy could give comparison of the slowness of both type compared to other defensive blade like Defense Alpha, Defense II, Matsushita, JSH, Joola CWX, Donic Def Play or other blades.

Awaiting this response. I always like your detailed technical aspect of your explanation on each of blade you have created. I am hoping to read those for this Tuvalu.


To my sorry, I don' give comparison information much with other brands' blades.
So, it's not possible from me.
If I do, I will be always saying that mine is better.

Regarding weight, I think basic function will not be different much.
But you need to think of the final weight you will prefer with rubbers on it.
It has bigger head size than normal blades, so it is affected by rubber weights much.

Regarding my blade, I think I gave information enough.
And I will wait for reviews now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2012, 00:32 
Offline
Full member
User avatar

Joined: 06 Jun 2008, 03:39
Posts: 87
Location: Essex, England
Am I correct in thinking the dark pattened front side will be for fast rubber and the plain side with a child will take the long pimple?

_________________
Blade: Tachi, F/H: Yasaka Pryde 40 2.0, B/H: Grass DTECS OX
Blade: Nexy Tavalu, F/H: Yasaka Pryde 40 2.0, B/H: Grass DTECS OX
Blade: DrN Firewall, F/H: Yasaka Pryde 40 2.0, B/H: Giant Talon

gathering dust awaiting next return of banned rubbers:
Blade: DrN High Tech Plus, F/H: Gambler Outlaw 2.0, B/H DR N Monster OX
Blade: Butterfly Grubba Pro, F/H: Gambler Outlaw 2.0, B/H: Grass Spezial OX

sold:
Blade: Mephisto 7001, F/H: Yasaka Pryde 40 2.0, B/H: Grass DTECS OX
Blade: Tachi-red, F/H: Hexer+, B/H: Grass DTECS OX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2012, 01:32 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2007, 15:49
Posts: 1325
Location: USofA
andrewh13 wrote:
Am I correct in thinking the dark pattened front side will be for fast rubber and the plain side with a child will take the long pimple?


Correct
tOD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Jul 2012, 19:57 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 14 Feb 2010, 04:41
Posts: 21
Hi Nexy,
Is there any blade you particulary recommand for backhand slick antis (Nigntmare, gorilla...), especially based on a carbon forehand layer.
Thanks
David


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 Jul 2012, 02:16 
Offline
Horse Hockey!
User avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2009, 03:25
Posts: 935
Location: North Carolina, USA
darkdave59 wrote:
Hi Nexy,
Is there any blade you particulary recommand for backhand slick antis (Nigntmare, gorilla...), especially based on a carbon forehand layer.
Thanks
David

Just to interject a response here...I've fallen in love with my Nexy Labyrinthos. If you want the carbon layer on the forehand for speed and blocking ability, the Labyrinthos is it. More of a hitter's blade and a delight for smashing, though I can loop away from the table. On the backhand an anti or LP with some deadening sponge will be necessary unless you are looking more for speed than control with the anti as well.

 

_________________
Giant Dragon Kris Special : Nittaku Hammond Pro Beta 2.1 black fh : Spinlord Dornenglanz Ox red bh
Member of Charlotte Table Tennis Club, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Visit Charlotte Table Tennis Club on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2012, 13:36 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 13 Jun 2010, 00:28
Posts: 187
cyber1call wrote:
darkdave59 wrote:
Hi Nexy,
Is there any blade you particulary recommand for backhand slick antis (Nigntmare, gorilla...), especially based on a carbon forehand layer.
Thanks
David

Just to interject a response here...I've fallen in love with my Nexy Labyrinthos. If you want the carbon layer on the forehand for speed and blocking ability, the Labyrinthos is it. More of a hitter's blade and a delight for smashing, though I can loop away from the table. On the backhand an anti or LP with some deadening sponge will be necessary unless you are looking more for speed than control with the anti as well.

 

Thank you for sharing your opinion.
I designed it to be an ultimate choice for long pimple attacker.
It has all the power you need, plus adequate stability on your long pimple side.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2012, 21:27 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 16 Jan 2009, 21:38
Posts: 174
Location: Germany
Due to the Tuvalu testing I am now conscious that Nexy is indeed a manufacturer of high quality blades. Furthermore asymmetric blades seems to be a speciality of Nexy.

As far as I can see from the blades descriptions and pictures the Tuvalu, Labyrinthos, Calix, Calix II are asymmetric with slower backhand.

Does anybody know about the speed ranking of these blades ?

Some comparative experiences would be informative too ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2012, 01:22 
Offline
Horse Hockey!
User avatar

Joined: 03 Dec 2009, 03:25
Posts: 935
Location: North Carolina, USA
cogito wrote:
As far as I can see from the blades descriptions and pictures the Tuvalu, Labyrinthos, Calix, Calix II are asymmetric with slower backhand. Does anybody know about the speed ranking of these blades?

I use a Nexy Labyrinthos. It is FAST and has zero vibration (9mm thick). The forehand is OFF++ so I use a medium-speed rubber (Nittaku Hammond Pro Beta) and it is a smashing, hitting and blocking monster over the table. I'm not a good looper close in, but with this blade I can loop pretty well with power from 2-3 meters back.

The backhand is definitely slower, but still OFF at least. I've had a hard time finding an LP that will tame this blade. I've come to like it so much for its forehand power that I keep coming back to it. I've tried a bunch of LPs including some with dampening sponge, but I think so far the LP that works best is the Spinlord Dornenglanz in Ox. It is still quite fast and a bit hard to control because there is very little dwell time in Ox with this blade. That also makes it pretty hard to chop away from the table because technique and timing have to be perfect. But for chop blocking and aggressive hitting if I just relax and hit with 80% power and make a complete follow-through (my biggest shortcoming), the Labyrinthos blade with the Dornenglanz will do the rest. There are slower LPs than the Dornenglanz (like the XiYing 979 or CK531A) but those rubbers just didn't seem to work on this blade for me.

So if you want power and speed at the sacrifice of some control, this blade will give you that. And make sure to avoid fast rubbers which would make this blade uncontrollable for most players.

 

_________________
Giant Dragon Kris Special : Nittaku Hammond Pro Beta 2.1 black fh : Spinlord Dornenglanz Ox red bh
Member of Charlotte Table Tennis Club, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
Visit Charlotte Table Tennis Club on Facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2012, 02:12 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 16 Jan 2009, 21:38
Posts: 174
Location: Germany
@cyber1call

Thanks. That is very informative. So the Labyrinthos is no choice for me. I am hoping for something slower than Tuvalu or if the same speed more suitable for long defence.

So how about the Calix (if there is somebody out there) ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next


Don't want to see this advertisement? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2012 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group