OOAK Table Tennis Forum
http://ooakforum.com/

Reduction of blade size
http://ooakforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=35603
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Bobv [ 18 May 2019, 09:28 ]
Post subject:  Reduction of blade size

Saw one other post on this. I have a DefPlay Senso that I cut down to the head size of my wife's Viscaria. I do love the feel of the Senso blade after getting it wanted a smaller head.

Have I changed the speed of the blade by doing this? Paddle Palace has the DefPlay rated as a DEf plus blade. Is this now an Allround blade due to the head size reduction, or does it not have any impact on the playing on the blade. Thanks!

Author:  hookshot [ 18 May 2019, 13:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

Everything else being equal, a lighter blade is slower and less power. Reducing the size will reduce the weight.

Author:  dazzler [ 18 May 2019, 19:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

I didn't notice any difference in speed/control when I reduced the Defplay,I found it better for topspin due to being able to swing faster with the lighter weight,I think the flex is slightly less too which is a good thing.There is speed variation between the 3 Defplays I own and the heaviest (was 87g when new)plays faster and is stiffer ,this one has more power than the 82g Stiga allround I own

Author:  skilless_slapper [ 20 May 2019, 15:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

A smaller blade of the same material is generally faster than the larger one. That is what blade makers will tell you. The bigger, over-sized version has more flex and give to it. Cutting it down gives a more direct, crisp feel. The actual weight is usually only changed slightly. Taking an over-sized blade to 'regular' size, I reduced the weight by only around 6 grams. That was with heavy materials to begin with, so using a blade like the defplay, I can imagine the weight reduction being very tiny.

Author:  iskandar taib [ 20 May 2019, 15:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

6 grams is significant (out of, say, 90 grams). Also there's the weight of the rubber - since it's cut smaller it also weighs less. If you use two sheets of inverted that's quite a bit of weight. Not so much if you use long pips.

Iskandar

Author:  dazzler [ 20 May 2019, 16:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

The 87g one ended up at 80g,and still head heavy compared to non senso blade

Author:  iskandar taib [ 21 May 2019, 03:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

A senso would have a hollow handle, right? If so I can see why it's "more head heavy". Remember that if you're using two sheets of inverted, that makes up a LOT of the weight of the racket, and it's ALL located beyond the handle.

Iskandar

Author:  Zverev [ 21 May 2019, 11:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

I would be keen to reduce head size of my Defplay which does feel like a little axe with inverted rubbers. It's full 20 g of extra weight compared to my normal size rackets with same rubber.
How did you do it?
What tools are the best?
Would be great to hear about your experience.
Cheers

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Author:  ChasFox [ 21 May 2019, 17:29 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

dazzler wrote:
The 87g one ended up at 80g,and still head heavy compared to non senso blade


A lump of blu tack on the end of the handle is quick way of balancing a blade.

Author:  keme [ 21 May 2019, 17:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

ChasFox wrote:
dazzler wrote:
The 87g one ended up at 80g,and still head heavy compared to non senso blade

A lump of blu tack on the end of the handle is quick way of balancing a blade.

... or you could duct-tape a 20p (or two) to the end of the handle.
As indicated by others, perceived "overweight" can usually be rectified by correcting the balance, even when that implies adding weight.

Author:  iskandar taib [ 21 May 2019, 18:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

I think this would work better for chopping than for a looping blade...

Iskandar

Author:  iskandar taib [ 21 May 2019, 18:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

Zverev wrote:
I would be keen to reduce head size of my Defplay which does feel like a little axe with inverted rubbers. It's full 20 g of extra weight compared to my normal size rackets with same rubber.
How did you do it?
What tools are the best?
Would be great to hear about your experience.


Probably a bandsaw or jigsaw and a belt/disc sander. But I think it would be better to buy another blade and keep the Defplay for when you eventually want to try long pips.

Iskandar

Author:  Zverev [ 21 May 2019, 22:44 ]
Post subject:  Re: Reduction of blade size

iskandar taib wrote:
Zverev wrote:
I would be keen to reduce head size of my Defplay which does feel like a little axe with inverted rubbers. It's full 20 g of extra weight compared to my normal size rackets with same rubber.
How did you do it?
What tools are the best?
Would be great to hear about your experience.


Probably a bandsaw or jigsaw and a belt/disc sander. But I think it would be better to buy another blade and keep the Defplay for when you eventually want to try long pips.

Iskandar

Yep, I think I eventually would... :)

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 9:30 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/