OOAK Table Tennis Forum

Hi,

Happy New Year everyone

I would like to know the differences between these 2 rubbers : Speed, spin, throw angle,

It' for my forehand, i play on the table, and my game it's : mainly : pushes, block, hit and topspin

which of 2 would match my game


Thank you for help

The first one, of course. The second one pushes and blocks OK but it absolutely useless for blocks and topspin...



Iskandar

Thanks

Er, you do realize I was joking, right? I doubt anyone here has tested these two rubbers back to back.. and if they had, the differences would probably have been subtle. Though of course anyone could probably just read the catalog and figure it out.. Now, if you had asked for a comparison between Tenergy 05 and 64, or between Tenergy 05 and Batwings, there'd be no shortage of informed opinions.

Iskandar

Review:

http://tabletennis-reviews.com/victas-v ... 02-limber/

If it's to substitute your Tenergy 25FX the Limber will be closest in sponge hardness and weight.

_________________
2. S&T Black & White / Armstrong SH-I 1.8 / TSP Curl P3 Alpha R OX

Interesting. So these are unlabeled Tensors? And by "tacky" they don't mean Chinese tacky, I take it.. the photos in the review also show quite a bit of dish.. hopefully that's just the way the sheets were "posed" rather than the actual case.

Iskandar

Manufacturer describes it as a "high energy tension rubber" on the cover but not sure if it can be called a Tensor without the logo. I have a sheet of 402 DE and would describe it as only very slightly tacky. Minimal dish that I recall prior to applying so I assume it's posed that way.

_________________
2. S&T Black & White / Armstrong SH-I 1.8 / TSP Curl P3 Alpha R OX

Apparently some brands sell "unlabeled Tensors", Donic, Gewo, Tibhar and Yasaka among them. Don't know if they have to pay ESN for NOT using the Tensor logo or if they AVOID paying ESN because they choose not to use the logo.

Iskandar