OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
Live Table Tennis Videos Table Tennis News Live OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 16 Aug 2018, 13:54


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!


View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Table Tennis Equipment - Specialised/Mainstream » Inverted rubbers

All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 8 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Doudou
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2018, 17:44 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2018, 17:24
Posts: 4
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Blade: Timo boll control
FH: Tenergy 25FX 1,7
BH: Victas vs401 1,5
Hi,

Happy New Year everyone

I would like to know the differences between these 2 rubbers : Speed, spin, throw angle,

It' for my forehand, i play on the table, and my game it's : mainly : pushes, block, hit and topspin

which of 2 would match my game


Thank you for help
Top
 Profile  
 


Don't want to see this advertisement? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!
iskandar taib
PostPosted: 17 Jan 2018, 14:37 
Offline
Goes to 11
Goes to 11
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014, 20:27
Posts: 6801
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 834 times
Doudou wrote:
which of 2 would match my game


The first one, of course. The second one pushes and blocks OK but it absolutely useless for blocks and topspin...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Iskandar
Top
 Profile  
 
Doudou
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2018, 16:03 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2018, 17:24
Posts: 4
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Blade: Timo boll control
FH: Tenergy 25FX 1,7
BH: Victas vs401 1,5
Thanks :D :D
Top
 Profile  
 
iskandar taib
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2018, 12:58 
Offline
Goes to 11
Goes to 11
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014, 20:27
Posts: 6801
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 834 times
Er, you do realize I was joking, right? :lol: :lol: :lol: I doubt anyone here has tested these two rubbers back to back.. and if they had, the differences would probably have been subtle. Though of course anyone could probably just read the catalog and figure it out.. Now, if you had asked for a comparison between Tenergy 05 and 64, or between Tenergy 05 and Batwings, there'd be no shortage of informed opinions.

Iskandar
Top
 Profile  
 
Dusty054
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2018, 13:17 
Online
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jul 2017, 11:04
Posts: 306
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 79 times
Blade: S&T Firestarter
FH: Armstrong SH-I 1.8
BH: TSP Curl P3 Alpha R OX
Review:

http://tabletennis-reviews.com/victas-v ... 02-limber/

If it's to substitute your Tenergy 25FX the Limber will be closest in sponge hardness and weight.
Top
 Profile  
 
iskandar taib
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2018, 12:50 
Offline
Goes to 11
Goes to 11
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014, 20:27
Posts: 6801
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 834 times
Dusty054 wrote:
Review:

http://tabletennis-reviews.com/victas-v ... 02-limber/



Interesting. So these are unlabeled Tensors? And by "tacky" they don't mean Chinese tacky, I take it.. the photos in the review also show quite a bit of dish.. hopefully that's just the way the sheets were "posed" rather than the actual case.

Iskandar
Top
 Profile  
 
Dusty054
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2018, 14:43 
Online
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jul 2017, 11:04
Posts: 306
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 79 times
Blade: S&T Firestarter
FH: Armstrong SH-I 1.8
BH: TSP Curl P3 Alpha R OX
iskandar taib wrote:
Dusty054 wrote:
Review:

http://tabletennis-reviews.com/victas-v ... 02-limber/



Interesting. So these are unlabeled Tensors? And by "tacky" they don't mean Chinese tacky, I take it.. the photos in the review also show quite a bit of dish.. hopefully that's just the way the sheets were "posed" rather than the actual case.

Iskandar


Manufacturer describes it as a "high energy tension rubber" on the cover but not sure if it can be called a Tensor without the logo. I have a sheet of 402 DE and would describe it as only very slightly tacky. Minimal dish that I recall prior to applying so I assume it's posed that way.
Top
 Profile  
 
iskandar taib
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2018, 18:26 
Offline
Goes to 11
Goes to 11
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014, 20:27
Posts: 6801
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 834 times
Apparently some brands sell "unlabeled Tensors", Donic, Gewo, Tibhar and Yasaka among them. Don't know if they have to pay ESN for NOT using the Tensor logo or if they AVOID paying ESN because they choose not to use the logo.

Iskandar
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 8 posts ] 



Board index » Table Tennis Equipment - Specialised/Mainstream » Inverted rubbers

All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 9 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2012 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




Don't forget to 'LIKE' our forum on Facebook if you enjoy the content:

Advertisements by Advertisement Management