OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 03:14


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: 26 Mar 2010, 12:45 
Offline
Modern Chiseler.
Modern Chiseler.
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 06:49
Posts: 11148
Location: USA
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 578 times
Blade: WRM Gokushu2
FH: S&T Secret Flow 1mm
BH: S&T Monkey ox
Anger manager wrote:
How do you feel about the ban of frictionless pimples?
It is wrong to eradicate a style of play in this way. It would have been different had the rubbers still been the same colour on both sides, but as it is now it is just a daft ban.

This is a great quote. I hope the national associations listen to Waldner when the issue for rescinding the ban comes up this year at the ITTF AGM.

_________________



The MNNB Blog has had some pretty amazing stuff lately. Just click this text to check it out.
| My OOAK Interview
Table Tennis Video Links: itTV | laola1.tv | ttbl | fftt | Challenger Series | mnnb-tv

My whole set-up costs less than a sheet of Butterfly Dignics


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 26 Mar 2010, 20:01 
Offline
The Artist
The Artist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 00:31
Posts: 1504
Location: An islet off the European Coast
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times
I am sure those who want FLP reinstated will use it. And so they should.

There is little else to do than to agree with Waldners argument, IMHO. It makes sense.

_________________
NITTAKU SEPTEAR cpen | FH: 729 802, 1.5, black | RPB: CORNILLEAU PILOT POWER, 2.0, red
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Mar 2010, 10:19 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 00:41
Posts: 22
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time
speedplay wrote:
Anger manager wrote:

Is'nt so that boosters make your rubbers thicker and thats why they get disqualified?

And Waldner and many of the bests doesn't use boosters.. I think (can't say know) they get their rubbers "ready" to play with. But of course they can't say that.


Using boosters is, obviously, against the rules regardless if the rubber exceeds 4mm or not, the thickness just happens to be pretty much the only way they can catch them, since the ENEZ don't react to boosters.

There have been discussions about the square "box" on rubbers, not sure if this is yet in action, but if this "box" is stretched, they will also be caught, since stretching also is illegal.

I like how JO have a very practical way of looking at things, like the frictionless LP ban. That was more about banning a style then a rubber. While I can't say I'm a fan of the style, I don't like the rule.

A bit disappointed to find out he isn't an EJ (Equipment Junkie) as I was sure this was the road to success ;)

I do hope you get the opportunity to do a similar interview with Persson as well, as he seems to be more interested in this then JO. One thing I would like to ask, perhaps of the record since they are both sponsored players who don't want to bite the hand that feeds them, is, is it true that they, as pro's get different rubbers then the one's we can buy? Or, could JO walk in to any given TT-shop and pick up a sheet of Gold and expect it to perform the same way as the ones he get directly from Donic?


They get better rubbers then we do. I'll get back on the subject later on but the best players get the best kind of rubbers and then the sponsored players get the "next round" of rubbers and the it's the rest for us. But more on this later on..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Mar 2010, 23:45 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 00:41
Posts: 22
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time
speedplay wrote:
Look forward to it Anger!

I also know you mentioned something about having a lengthy discussion with Waldner about the Time-out and I know I would be thrilled to read the conclusions on this discussion. We have had a couple of discussions here about Time-outs, some people like to ban them, others think they are a waste of time while some see them as a new exiting addition to the game. There have also been discussions about what could be "corrected" during the time-outs. The way I see it, it is more about breaking the opponents flow then actually making any major changes in the game, but I'm not really at your (or JO's) level, so it would be nice to read what you guys thinks about it.


We had this discussion for about a hour and a half in a taxi from Saarbrücken to Frankurt a year ago during the Energis Masters 09 and the short conclusion is that Waldner really thinks a TO well used and with a good coach with a smart player can change the outcome of a set or match. Not only to break the momentum from the other player.

He is like a great chess master thinking som many steps ahead on what could happen and how to play the situation the best way. So many steps ahead that for us ordinaty players it's hard to realize how tactics can change the outcome.

More on this subject later on.. got to get ready for my vacation. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Oct 2010, 00:44 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 22:05
Posts: 755
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 5 times
Anger manager wrote:
Quote:
In my view they all use boosters, but in a "I am not involved" way. They themselves do not touch boosters. It is done for them at the factory, the so called "factory tuning". Still the same thing to me. They still use boosters, but without really acknowledging knowing about it, if you like. They just play with what they get. A bit like sports dopers saying "The trainer promised them blue and pink pills were vitamins..." ;)

However, it is just an example and boosters can not really be compared to doping, IMHO :)


This is exactly my opinion also.


that's it

I think most of them don't even care to know what are they really using. they can mechanically think 'factory makes it therefore it's legal', and they really don't want to know more. I think most of them are no really concerned with equipment, just like waldner

but it is true that they are not the ones responsible for situation


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 04 Jun 2011, 18:13 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 18:09
Posts: 1
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Dear friends

I like Interview with J-O Waldner, second part Equipment very much. Thank very much for all.

Very useful for me.

If you have some time, pls visit my blog at: pilot interview tips
Rgs


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2




All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group