OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 19 Apr 2024, 19:44


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!


View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Table Tennis Equipment - Specialised/Mainstream » Short Pimple rubbers

All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 8 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
LordCope
 Post subject: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 26 Oct 2017, 20:40 
Offline
LP Collector
LP Collector
User avatar

Joined: 01 Aug 2012, 06:57
Posts: 2289
Location: Hampshire, UK
Has thanked: 303 times
Been thanked: 333 times
Blade: Yaska Sweden Classic
FH: 802 OX
BH: DHS C8 OX
It's widely stated that 651 was changed at some point...

I have a sheet of 651, which doesn't have an ITTF number on it - just the logo. This one has slightly smaller, maybe slightly taller pips, with a lower pip density (ie more space around the pips).

I also have a sheet with the 24-030 serial number, which I believe is "current".

Would the older one, strictly speaking, be 'illegal'?

Anyone else got 2 x and can compare and confirm?

_________________
Yasaka Sweden Classic | 802 OX | C8 OX
Check out my blog - LordCope's Latest Learning Log - 10+ years of accumulate mistakes!
Top
 Profile  
 


bbkon
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2017, 04:56 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 25 May 2008, 04:35
Posts: 784
Location: puero rico
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 13 times
LordCope wrote:
It's widely stated that 651 was changed at some point...

I have a sheet of 651, which doesn't have an ITTF number on it - just the logo. This one has slightly smaller, maybe slightly taller pips, with a lower pip density (ie more space around the pips).

I also have a sheet with the 24-030 serial number, which I believe is "current".

Would the older one, strictly speaking, be 'illegal'?

Anyone else got 2 x and can compare and confirm?



same situation with old 802. pips are modified to suit the new ball the new 802 pips are more separated. the old 802 is useless same happens with 799
Top
 Profile  
 
haggisv
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 28 Oct 2017, 18:33 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33351
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2754 times
Been thanked: 1548 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
LordCope wrote:
It's widely stated that 651 was changed at some point...

I have a sheet of 651, which doesn't have an ITTF number on it - just the logo. This one has slightly smaller, maybe slightly taller pips, with a lower pip density (ie more space around the pips).

I also have a sheet with the 24-030 serial number, which I believe is "current".

Would the older one, strictly speaking, be 'illegal'?

Anyone else got 2 x and can compare and confirm?

Although many DHS rubbers are listed on the LARC both with and without the ITTF number, the 651 is not one of them, so I would think it's technically illegal as you say.
Unfortunately I don't have two to compare.

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide
Top
 Profile  
 
KarlP4001
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 06 Feb 2021, 15:52 
Offline
New Member
User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2014, 03:08
Posts: 41
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times
Blade: Vintage DHS 032 CPEN
FH: 651 2.2mm
BH: C7 1.0mm
Comparison pic of old 651 to new 651


Attachments:
IMG_3091.jpg
IMG_3091.jpg [ 962.44 KiB | Viewed 1445 times ]

_________________
Vintage PF4 032 cpen
DHS 651 2.2mm
Currently messing with... DHS C7 1.0mm (a lot of fun!)
Top
 Profile  
 
igorponger
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 07 Feb 2021, 02:58 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 09:24
Posts: 1359
Location: Universe
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 102 times
? ? ?
ITTF Rules allow a rubber to be present in the LARC for 10 years without the need for the rubber being re-attested till the end of the term.
Utterly meaningless rules to me.
Top
 Profile  
 
1dennistt
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 13 Feb 2021, 08:17 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 06:02
Posts: 214
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 28 times
Blade: Donic Waldner WC 89 FL
FH: Donic BlueStar A2 Red Max
BH: DMS Firestorm Black 1.8
haggisv wrote:
LordCope wrote:
It's widely stated that 651 was changed at some point...

I have a sheet of 651, which doesn't have an ITTF number on it - just the logo. This one has slightly smaller, maybe slightly taller pips, with a lower pip density (ie more space around the pips).

I also have a sheet with the 24-030 serial number, which I believe is "current".

Would the older one, strictly speaking, be 'illegal'?

Anyone else got 2 x and can compare and confirm?

Although many DHS rubbers are listed on the LARC both with and without the ITTF number, the 651 is not one of them, so I would think it's technically illegal as you say.
Unfortunately I don't have two to compare.



Looks like 651 is on the current LARC, I sorted by Double Happiness and it is on page 2 with the 24-030 serial number.

I think the older one is illegal now.

_________________
Donic Waldner World Champion 89 FL; Donic BlueStar A2 (Red) Max; DMS Firestorm (Black) 1.8
Top
 Profile  
 
igorponger
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 13 Feb 2021, 09:47 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 09:24
Posts: 1359
Location: Universe
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 102 times
Yes, once an obsolete rubber was disclosed at the beginning of a match, the offender must replace the rubber for another one without any delay. Otherwise he ought to go outcast for the rest of a competition.

It was a sore mishap that has once happened to a Polish female-player during European Club League,

IGNORANCE OF THE LAW MAKES NO EXCUSE.
Top
 Profile  
 
KarlP4001
 Post subject: Re: Old 651 New 651
PostPosted: 15 Feb 2021, 11:11 
Offline
New Member
User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2014, 03:08
Posts: 41
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times
Blade: Vintage DHS 032 CPEN
FH: 651 2.2mm
BH: C7 1.0mm
1dennistt wrote:
haggisv wrote:
LordCope wrote:
It's widely stated that 651 was changed at some point...

I have a sheet of 651, which doesn't have an ITTF number on it - just the logo. This one has slightly smaller, maybe slightly taller pips, with a lower pip density (ie more space around the pips).

I also have a sheet with the 24-030 serial number, which I believe is "current".

Would the older one, strictly speaking, be 'illegal'?

Anyone else got 2 x and can compare and confirm?

Although many DHS rubbers are listed on the LARC both with and without the ITTF number, the 651 is not one of them, so I would think it's technically illegal as you say.
Unfortunately I don't have two to compare.



Looks like 651 is on the current LARC, I sorted by Double Happiness and it is on page 2 with the 24-030 serial number.

I think the older one is illegal now.
The old version plays good! I tried it on that 032 shake hands. (Of course penhold) I’m still looking for a SP that plays like it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Vintage PF4 032 cpen
DHS 651 2.2mm
Currently messing with... DHS C7 1.0mm (a lot of fun!)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 8 posts ] 



Board index » Table Tennis Equipment - Specialised/Mainstream » Short Pimple rubbers

All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group