OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
Live Table Tennis Videos Table Tennis News Live OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 20 Aug 2018, 20:53


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 21 Jul 2018, 05:02 
Offline
Chopoleon Bonaparte
User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2009, 07:21
Posts: 669
Location: New York, New York
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 79 times
Blade: Re-impact Smart
FH: Spinlord Sandwind 1.5mm
BH: Spinlord Agenda OX
I was watching this video from Ademir Balaban (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB2a0o9 ... =WL&t=107s), and I see he mostly blocks loops right off the bounce, holding his bat at 90 degrees or even a bit more closed, very similar to what you'd do with OX long pips. I've found other sources suggesting you need to open your bat a bit to block heavy loops with frictionless antis, and in this video, Amir Ahmed seems to push forward a bit in blocking most of the loops: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vz2RES7DKA

Anyone have a view here that could help explain the difference or elucidate what the better approach might be? Thanks.

_________________
I. Re-Impact Smart; FH: TSP Spinpips RED 2.1mm; BH: Dr. Neubauer Gangster OX
II. Sauer & Troger Firestarter; FH: Spinlord Waran 1.8mm; BH: Giant Dragon Snowflake OX
III. Sauer & Troger Firestarter; FH: Yasaka Rakza 7 Soft 1.8mm; BH: Joola Badman Reloaded OX
IV. Victas Koji Matsushita; FH: Yasaka Rakza 7 Soft 1.8mm; BH: TSP P-1R 1.0-1.3mm
USATT Rating: 2037


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: 21 Jul 2018, 21:27 
Offline
Goes to 11
Goes to 11
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014, 20:27
Posts: 6811
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 836 times
Grip/wrist stiffness? Slight racket movement?

Iskandar


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2018, 08:35 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 31945
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 1628 times
Been thanked: 1103 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dornenglanz OX
Having had a go at frictionless anti some time ago, I really struggled finding the right angle as well. This was particularly against hard spinny loops, where the natural tendency is to close the bat angle a little... which simply does not work with frictionless anti.

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2018, 10:12 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2012, 10:37
Posts: 427
Location: Phoenix
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 61 times
Blade: OSP Ultimate
FH: DHS H3N
BH: DrN ABS 2.1
haggisv wrote:
Having had a go at frictionless anti some time ago, I really struggled finding the right angle as well. This was particularly against hard spinny loops, where the natural tendency is to close the bat angle a little... which simply does not work with frictionless anti.

This was in particular the case with the older generation of frictionless antis but it has been improved with some of the newer antis and/or by going to a thicker sponge. However, coming from other rubbers, figuring out the right bat angle is still the biggest issue when switching to frictionless antis. In particular on hard shots it also helps to hold the bat more lose but this needs to be practiced quite a bit. With the new ABS ball it is also more important than before to block the ball right off the bounce to keep the ball low.

_________________
Equipment:
OSP Ultimate ST, FH: DHS H3 Neo 2.1, BH: Dr. Neubauer ABS 2.1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 01:24 
Offline
Chopoleon Bonaparte
User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2009, 07:21
Posts: 669
Location: New York, New York
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 79 times
Blade: Re-impact Smart
FH: Spinlord Sandwind 1.5mm
BH: Spinlord Agenda OX
I'm good with the blocking-right-off-the-bounce part (a natural instinct from my usual OX long pips setup ... though, in fact, I'm finding that with anti, I can even take it a bit later than I would with long pips, and as long as I get the angle right, I'm okay), but the problem is that if I use the same blocking angle I use with long pips the ball often does a nosedive straight down. So I have to block with a slightly open blade, sometimes even with a slight push forward. I'm trying out the Dr. Neubauer ABS 2.1mm right now, and the dampening effect is huge, while the reversal seems good enough, but I need to give it some time to see if I can get the angle right.

_________________
I. Re-Impact Smart; FH: TSP Spinpips RED 2.1mm; BH: Dr. Neubauer Gangster OX
II. Sauer & Troger Firestarter; FH: Spinlord Waran 1.8mm; BH: Giant Dragon Snowflake OX
III. Sauer & Troger Firestarter; FH: Yasaka Rakza 7 Soft 1.8mm; BH: Joola Badman Reloaded OX
IV. Victas Koji Matsushita; FH: Yasaka Rakza 7 Soft 1.8mm; BH: TSP P-1R 1.0-1.3mm
USATT Rating: 2037


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 06:22 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2012, 10:37
Posts: 427
Location: Phoenix
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 61 times
Blade: OSP Ultimate
FH: DHS H3N
BH: DrN ABS 2.1
TraditionalTradesman wrote:
I'm good with the blocking-right-off-the-bounce part (a natural instinct from my usual OX long pips setup ... though, in fact, I'm finding that with anti, I can even take it a bit later than I would with long pips, and as long as I get the angle right, I'm okay), but the problem is that if I use the same blocking angle I use with long pips the ball often does a nosedive straight down. So I have to block with a slightly open blade, sometimes even with a slight push forward. I'm trying out the Dr. Neubauer ABS 2.1mm right now, and the dampening effect is huge, while the reversal seems good enough, but I need to give it some time to see if I can get the angle right.

Yes your bat angle has to be more open than with pips and the more spin the more open which seems counter intuitive. Only on slow loops should you apply a slight push forward because any motion during the stroke tends to decrease the reversal so if you don't need to push, don't push. Unfortunately there is no easy fix and it will require some practice like a few months to have it automated.
I have not tested the ABS 2.1mm yet but as a matter of fact I glued it on to my spare bat last night and hope to test it tomorrow or Thursday. I have actually played with a Dr. N prototype anti the last few weeks which I liked a lot but I can't say more about it...

_________________
Equipment:
OSP Ultimate ST, FH: DHS H3 Neo 2.1, BH: Dr. Neubauer ABS 2.1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 08:48 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 11:24
Posts: 478
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 121 times
Blade: Innershield ZLF
FH: Chop-City!
BH: Curl P-4 OX
It has to be open a bit more than with LP. The more spin it has, the more open it needs to be! By open here, generally it would be around 90 degrees. Basically straight up and down. Same thing with back spin, but you hit into the ball there to return a fast top spin/no spin.

Against fast balls you let the pace return itself, against slower ones you'll need to bump into it a bit. Watch Amelie Solja for some of that technique.

_________________
Innershield zlf
Tenergy 80 fx 1.7
Backhand: Curl p-4 OX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 13:44 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 31945
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 1628 times
Been thanked: 1103 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dornenglanz OX
Matt Pimple wrote:
the more spin the more open which seems counter intuitive.

Yes it does seem counter intuitive, but I do think you're right, but can't figure out a logical explanation for it.... can you?

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 14:07 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 11:24
Posts: 478
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 121 times
Blade: Innershield ZLF
FH: Chop-City!
BH: Curl P-4 OX
haggisv wrote:
Matt Pimple wrote:
the more spin the more open which seems counter intuitive.

Yes it does seem counter intuitive, but I do think you're right, but can't figure out a logical explanation for it.... can you?


Yes, when you normally block a top spin shot with regular rubber -- it kicks up, hence why blocks more often go long against slow top spin.

With frictionless anti spin, the ball is blocked back as back spin. So when it hits the rubber, it turns into back spin and dives down. Just the same as if you were to flip a table half way up and top spin against it. The ball drops down as back spin and bounces back to you.

With regular inverted, the ball grips the rubber and actually reverses spin. Top spin goes back as top spin etc. the anti doesn't actually reverse at all! It just passes spin through, while changing the balls direction.

_________________
Innershield zlf
Tenergy 80 fx 1.7
Backhand: Curl p-4 OX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 15:08 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 31945
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 1628 times
Been thanked: 1103 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dornenglanz OX
While I do like your explanation, I don't think it's complete.

If what you're saying is true, it would be even more so for long pimples (in OX) because they have more reversal (due to much smaller contact area), but it's not.

Also what we're talking about here are hard and fast loops, where the curve on the ball is minimal because the speed is so high.

I think the only explanation is that for fast loops, the harder it hits the rubber, the less it grips, so you need to open the bat angle more. The question remains though, why would this not also be the case of OX LPs?

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2018, 15:40 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 24 Apr 2011, 11:24
Posts: 478
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 121 times
Blade: Innershield ZLF
FH: Chop-City!
BH: Curl P-4 OX
haggisv wrote:
While I do like your explanation, I don't think it's complete.

If what you're saying is true, it would be even more so for long pimples (in OX) because they have more reversal (due to much smaller contact area), but it's not.

Also what we're talking about here are hard and fast loops, where the curve on the ball is minimal because the speed is so high.

I think the only explanation is that for fast loops, the harder it hits the rubber, the less it grips, so you need to open the bat angle more. The question remains though, why would this not also be the case of OX LPs?



Frictionless anti has much less grip than the current allowable lp in ox. More reversal by a large margin! Like the mega block or dr n bison. You'd have to compare it with the old frictionless lp. I do have a sheet of the dr n super block frictionless lp and the same holds true with it needing to be opened.

I test all of these with an amicus pro robot where it has independent speed and spin settings. I.e. slow loops or fast heavy loops

You can test it fairly well with just a bare blade, no rubber on it. It will rebound fast but the angle will be similar

_________________
Innershield zlf
Tenergy 80 fx 1.7
Backhand: Curl p-4 OX


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2012 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




Don't forget to 'LIKE' our forum on Facebook if you enjoy the content: