TM is definitely not living on hype as far as its ability to gain and maintain control/placement with or without sponge.

I've found TM to be nothing special with most blades. I tried it on many blades with no success until people in this thread steered me to my current setup. Now I'm happy, except I just heard that my forehand rubber is being discontinued. It's always something.

Now I just ordered a A. Grubba All+ for comparison. I believe the most comparable blade I have used would be the Donic Cayman which is all Balsa. Also, I do not believe the Black OX TM is any less effective than the Red OX. I know that has been the issue in the past with some LP's.

. I tried it on many blades with no success until people in this thread steered me to my current setup. Now I'm happy, except I just heard that my forehand rubber is being discontinued. It's always something.

Dear all,
Could u please compare Dtecs(0.5) VS TM(0.6) on a scale of 1-10 on
1>Serve Return
2> Pushes
3> Blocks
4> Chops
5> Roll/Hits
6>Serves with pips
Thanks in advance
-regards

Dr Neubauer Troublemaker black OX
Personnal conclusion and short review.

Chop blocks:
Active chopblocks are very good, good speed and good reversal
Passive blocks, less reversal but possible to keep the ball on the table with little sink and medium speed.

Long distance defence:
Very good reversal long distance
But I think that you have to play the Troublemaker near the table to get the most out of it.

Attacking possibilitys:
Easy to open up backspin with LP technique or sort of topspin stroke.
Possible to attack opponent serve. Good grip.

Deception:
Comes from the flexibility of the rubber. Good attacking possibilitys.
Not the most disruptive effect, but a lot of flexibility makes it deceptive.
Active blockstrokes with good reversal, passive blockstrokes a bit less.
Good control in defence with high reversal ball for a pip in OX.
Good variation possible in attack and defensive shots.

Conclusion:
Good control easy to use after time to adapt, speed is medium-slow, spininsensitive.
Pushes are controlable and ok.
Play active (active chopblock, attack backspin,… ) to get the most out of it in a close to the table game.
It takes the pace of really well if your bat is moving.

A fun to use, and a good new experience Thx DOC

Having played with Troublemaker for a while now, I thought I'd give an update on my impressions. I played a tournament a couple of weeks ago where I was playing all players rated higher than me (most in the 1800-2200 USATT level).
I started out playing a closer to the table style, pushing, chop blocking, and hitting with the TM. I was able to beat a player early on who was rated just under 1800 so I was encouraged by my results. As the first day of the tournament went along, something became apparent to me. And it's a topic that has been discussed on this forum. The fact that, with the new ball, shots are generally more "fast" than "spinny", especially as the level of the player goes up. The main problem I was having was, for very good players, once they adjusted to the pace of the TM, they didn't generally have a lot of difficulty re-looping.
On the second day I backed off the table a step to give myself more time to chop block and chop a little more, and played more of a control game on my forehand also. This strategy worked better. I didn't win any matches, but I did manage to take multiple games off players in the 1900-2200 level. I was able to drop balls a little shorter and at better angles with more time. And, attacks were very effective because they were so dead. But, again these players generally were able to adjust to the TM.
This has led me to the idea, which I believe has been discussed here, that the TM is very effective for defense up to a certain level. But above that level, you're a bit at the mercy of your opponent. This isn't to say that TM isn't a good rubber. I still believe it is. However, I just question my "ceiling" with it, that is, how high could I go. I know I could comfortably play at my 1700 level with it, but I don't know if I could go higher.
So, I've chosen to try a style that's at mid distance, moving in and back as needed, and give a try to TSP P1-R Curl in 0.3-0.6 mm sponge. I had a couple of days over the weekend to give it a try, and while I made a number of mistakes due to how different it is from TM, I can see a lot of potential with it. From that distance, the ability to send back heavier spin was noticeable. It was also easier to mix spin and dead balls. I had to adjust the angle of my blade, since it felt like the throw was a lot lower than the TM, but once I did things went well. The biggest areas where I think TM has an edge are control and hitting.
As I've read elsewhere, you have to be spot on with reading the spin and get the right blade angle. TM is far more forgiving. Hitting with my pips is a big part of my game, and the hits from TM were more disruptive. The TSP rubber has more ability to generate its own spin in my opinion, and thus the hits are more "normal", as they have a bit of top spin on them, rather than the flat balls from TM.
Still, the players that I normally play were definitely more troubled by my defense with the P1-R. Thus, I think I may have a higher ceiling with it. I'll give it a little time, see if I can develop my control with it and if I'm more or less competitive with the group at the next level above me.

What you have just narrated so well mirrors my impressions about TM that I posted in this thread some weeks ago ,which reinforces my theory on TM : TM from about 2200 USA level players up is harmless as they can reloop easily .