OOAK Table Tennis Forum https://ooakforum.com/ |
|
Victas VO > 102 https://ooakforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=27382 |
Page 3 of 4 |
Author: | BACKHAND [ 31 Jan 2020, 07:34 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
That could be it then. The pimples were very short and also wide, there was hardly a gap. They were brilliant and had so much control. The company still makes them and but now abiding within the new rules. But they are nowhere near as good and look different. I used to use Winning NP 1 (which is classed as an orthodox pimple, but without a backing) and I put on my own fast sponge. Also Winning NP 8 were very similar and came already with sponge. But the pimples where slightly taller. If I was clever enough I could send you photos cause I still have them in a box somewhere. Also the ones that succeeded them. Anyway anyone got any news about Victas 201 Although I have already ordered a sheet now to try. |
Author: | igorponger [ 31 Jan 2020, 09:27 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
ITTF have issued some reminder to all the equipment manufacturers, as follows: ITTF Memo to all table tennis manufacturers wrote: While our prime intention in publishing LARC list twice a year is to give a useful guidance on which products may be used in International play, we cannot guarantee that all of the products listed will continue to be authorised. From time to time we may find out that a sample has somewhat changed in its manufacture. If we are unable to persuade the involved manufacturer to make necessary adjustments to the products in question, we have no alternative but to discontinue the authorisation. When we do so, an announcement will appear in the Equipment section of the http://www.ittf.com/equipment and the current LARC list will be updated accordingly. Attachment: Impartial_BANNED.jpg [ 46.5 KiB | Viewed 9188 times ] Butterfly reinstated the rubber in the year 2017, upon being renamed a little. BUTTERFLY LARC 2019_A 023/ Impartial XS / Out 024/ Impartial XB / Out /Be happy/ |
Author: | BACKHAND [ 31 Jan 2020, 21:04 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
I think the original Winning NP 1 where also shorter than 1mm I think probably .75mm. So that must be the reason. Very annoying as they were very good. So much control. |
Author: | Rinforzando [ 25 May 2020, 21:07 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Hi there, I bought a sheet of the vo102 in 1.8mm. I'd like to know if there is a big difference between 1.8 and 2.0, and between 1.8 and max. Do Thicker version of the sponge allow us to produce more spin ? Is there a big speed difference ? |
Author: | BACKHAND [ 26 May 2020, 02:06 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Some of the thinner sponges are to slow in my opinion. Before the lock down I had just started using Victas 102 with Max sponge. I think it would be to slow in anything less. |
Author: | lasta [ 26 May 2020, 10:08 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Rinforzando wrote: Hi there, I bought a sheet of the vo102 in 1.8mm. I'd like to know if there is a big difference between 1.8 and 2.0, and between 1.8 and max. Do Thicker version of the sponge allow us to produce more spin ? Is there a big speed difference ? With short pips, the thinner sponges are faster when you smash. Thick sponges are easier to generate spin with, and are faster when you loop. |
Author: | nathanso [ 30 May 2020, 15:39 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
lasta wrote: Rinforzando wrote: Hi there, I bought a sheet of the vo102 in 1.8mm. I'd like to know if there is a big difference between 1.8 and 2.0, and between 1.8 and max. Do Thicker version of the sponge allow us to produce more spin ? Is there a big speed difference ? With short pips, the thinner sponges are faster when you smash. Thick sponges are easier to generate spin with, and are faster when you loop. |
Author: | Rinforzando [ 31 May 2020, 01:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
nathanso wrote: lasta wrote: Rinforzando wrote: Hi there, I bought a sheet of the vo102 in 1.8mm. I'd like to know if there is a big difference between 1.8 and 2.0, and between 1.8 and max. Do Thicker version of the sponge allow us to produce more spin ? Is there a big speed difference ? With short pips, the thinner sponges are faster when you smash. Thick sponges are easier to generate spin with, and are faster when you loop. Thanks for the answer! I guess I'll try both haha. Nathanso, are you still playing with the Victas VO> 102 as your main setup for fh ? If yes, wich thickness ? |
Author: | mokong [ 31 May 2020, 18:01 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Rinforzando wrote: Hi there, thicker sponge will better in looping.at mid distance, thinner sponge will be better at close to the table, quick attackI bought a sheet of the vo102 in 1.8mm. I'd like to know if there is a big difference between 1.8 and 2.0, and between 1.8 and max. Do Thicker version of the sponge allow us to produce more spin ? Is there a big speed difference ? Sent from my Redmi 6A using Tapatalk |
Author: | Rinforzando [ 05 Jun 2020, 05:14 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
How is the throw angle between Spinpips Red and Vo 102 ? I guess the throw angle of the Vo 102 is higher but the SRED has also a high throw angle ? |
Author: | nathanso [ 05 Jun 2020, 13:55 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Rinforzando wrote: How is the throw angle between Spinpips Red and Vo 102 ? I guess the throw angle of the Vo 102 is higher but the SRED has also a high throw angle ? They are about the same. The Victas is louder and a little faster. The TSP is the king of incoming spin resistance and can take spin off the ball like nobody's business.
|
Author: | Rinforzando [ 14 Jul 2020, 20:54 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Well, just a little report there. Most of the things I will say have already been covered but at least it will confirm them. Spin (high to low): Vo102 > 802-40 >= Rakza po Sponge hardness (Hard to soft): 802-40 > Rakza Po > Vo102 Arc (high to low): Vo102 > 802-40 >= Rakza Po Speed: Vo102 >= Rakza Po > 802-40 (but it wasn't on the same blade so it may be false. 802-40 is the slowest in any case (both the normal one and the Mystery 3)) Spin sensibility: Vo102 > Rakza Po >= 802-40 Since I have a slick anti on the backhand, I need the spinniest sp on the fh for more versatility. So I will keep the Vo102. The Rakza Po wasn't bad at all, but there is just less spin (on serve and opening loops especially) than the Vo102. 802-40 isn't that bad, it's actually quite good too. But my main reproach is that the sponge is too hard, even on the Mystery 3, resulting in a very short dwell time. The ball doesn't bite well the sponge so it was harder than Vo102 and Rakza Po on opening loops. I have a sheet of Spinpips red, but I don't think I will try it, I already bought 3 other Vo102 in various thickness lol. |
Author: | bbkon [ 01 Sep 2020, 00:14 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
nathanso wrote: Rinforzando wrote: How is the throw angle between Spinpips Red and Vo 102 ? I guess the throw angle of the Vo 102 is higher but the SRED has also a high throw angle ? They are about the same. The Victas is louder and a little faster. The TSP is the king of incoming spin resistance and can take spin off the ball like nobody's business.what pips have better spin resistance? |
Author: | Rinforzando [ 01 Sep 2020, 07:10 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
tsp spinpips red |
Author: | Croudy [ 19 Jun 2021, 17:37 ] |
Post subject: | Re: Victas VO > 102 |
Review of VO 102: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0s2lBh-51m0 |
Page 3 of 4 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |