I would prefer to use the new "Dream" for outdoor pimples without sponge, as it is mega good and fulfils the highest disturbance potentials for this. When it comes to tempo characteristics, the Rapier 44 (defensive all-round +) would also be of great advantage here. But my first choice would always be the new "Dream 2019", because this competition blade is made for ox-picks with the highest interference potential.
The Chevanti and Chevanti(Soft) are best made for Anti and Glanti rubbers in the backhand, because these rubbers have to have a special double dampening effect to be dangerous.
A simple damping effect is not at all sufficient for Glanti rubbers, because the balls can suddenly rise drastically during long game changes due to the high static charging effects of the balls, because they will the rolling resistance then especially on friction coefficient rubbers then immediately reduce.
Static loading effects can always lead to unpleasant game effects when playing. This can then also lead to an undesirable loss of control.
Therefore, I can less recommend outside pimle rubbers without sponge here, as a double stop effect can then also lead to the balls rising. However, with pimples outside with sponge the Chevanti or Chevanti (S) works very well.
There are actually no duplicate timbers in my range of offerings. They mostly differ from each other only in the focal points. So the focal points create the best playing conditions, while limit values will tend to create playing weaknesses.
For example, Rapier 44 is a super defensive blade. But it is also a super topspin blade the other way round. But if I want to shoot powerfully with it, then I have to set particularly hard playing rubbers so that the mass behaviour of the blade can effectively increase for a spinless good shot. So if I use soft rubbers for this competition blade, I cannot want to create shooting safety via the shot play.
And now there is also the weight. If I now have to use 8-9 layers with the Glanti, the minimum weight without play pads is already quite high; with Chevanti up to 75 g and with ChevantiS up to 85 g with the small blade, if I include the mcp system here. A medium or large blade is less recommended at this weight. Chevanti and Chevalier are already sorted in a prototypenselection. So I can't build them lighter because 9 layers together weigh more than seven do. But with the Rapier or Dream 2019 larger blades are no problem at all, because these woods are only 6-7 layers, so 2 layers or better at least 15 gram lighter than 8-9 layers could ever be.
This is one more point to recommend the Dream 2019, because all points and explanations about this blade correspond to reality and the test result of many test players. It can simply do everything and is certainly also very good for normal antiplayers. But Glantis can only be played very well on the Chevanti or chevantiS and that is what it is all about here, isn't it!
The "Dream 2019" has fewer control values than the "Chevalier"; yes of course! " But actually only because it is much cheaper to build!"
If I were to use the perfect construction here, as I did with the "Chevalier", I would have to sell the competition racket Dream at the same price as the Chevalier, because the manufacturing effort would be twice as high as normal.
But if a wood like the Chevanti(S) is already particularly heavy, it will be much more difficult to bring the control values here to play in a properly sensitive way. So I have to choose it as a Perfect Bau in any case, so that the total weight remains more favourable. But I don't have to do that with the "Dream 2019", because the simple construction is good.
Take a closer look at the technical data. Then you will see that the bending elasticity is specified there. You can see from this value which playing surfaces must have advantages. If a blade is particularly soft, it will certainly only play well with hard rubbers. And if it is also low in catapult, then the best choice is probably the BTY Dignics 09 c in 2.1 mm, because the rubber is very catapulting. But it also has to be very well played in. This is certainly not for players who only want to test such a blade with unplayed rubbers for a short time.
These rubbers have to be played in for at least 14 days until they produce the special softness in the surface effect. Then this particular rubber is the best I have ever played.
My word on it; it doesn't get any better than the Chevalier or ChevantiS, for example. I recommend these BTY rubbers here in particular, because these rubbers make my woods really shine. Only so I favour this choice because of that! But as reseller, I am not allowed to recommend these rubbers "because I cannot free guarantee the service of fitting" them due to the lack of discounts.
However, we have also found that the exceptional Dignics 09 c rubber can also be played very well on hard woods when it is properly ready for use.
And check out my detailed advice and reviews on my online site "Re-Impact". I hardly think there are other manufacturers who write this in as much detail as Re-Impact does. "Re-Impact" is real and not "Alice in Wonderland" as many keep thinking and writing variously. Woods that regulate the tempo themselves exist as a matter of course and probably only at Re-Impact, because other manufacturers make it their business to only promote the development of playing rubbers, but completely disregard the playing woods, which are the soul of everyone's game.
After all, I can only play well if everything - rackets and playing rubbers - is effectively put together to get the desired direction of play.
"Re-Impact competition blades" have successfully completed 21 years of professional development. That is why I always write publicly about competition rackets, because they comply with the current ITTF rules and have always done so for 21 years.
What many table tennis players obviously don't know, however, is that "re-impact rackets" are not mass-produced, but are custom-made due to the system, 90 % of which are carefully handmade.
That's why it must also take longer for you to get your order delivered, because these clubs are all manufactured after the order is placed and can only be delivered then. This can then actually take 2 months for a delivery to Australia if the merchandise mail is chosen and not the more expensive insured DHL package premium shipping. So bring a little time when you order to play more effectively.
The special aerodynamic or asymmetric racket shape can be adapted to our body and our individual movement towards the ball with the mcp system so that the player not only gets the feeling that particularly thick playing woods have a very large sweet spot, but the arm and shoulder joints are noticeably relieved when playing.
Especially the introduction of the new plastic balls is a gain for the physical meaning of "re-impact rackets" in the special technique application, because I can play these rackets with quite natural physical processes. I actually only have to adjust the height of the balls by opening or closing movements of the racket itself, similar to playing rubbers, so that the ball reaches the right flight height to avoid starving before it reaches the net. This takes a little practice because the angle of play can be very demanding with balls played very flat in order to be able to play back at this good flight height. You will notice that the balls are always reproducible, especially with the Chevanti, for example, in the fast topspin game, to name one focal point.
The special play rubbers of many good manufacturers also optimise the play effects of the "re-impact rackets" here. However, maximally thick play rubbers are not at all suitable for "re-impact rackets", but are usually only very good to use up to 2.1 mm, because the contact effect of the ball must also be felt on the racket on. This is the only way to feel the special playing characteristics of the blade and the surface in order to play table tennis successfully and effectively.
Strangely enough, with the model type "Chevanti(S)" or "Chevalier", the spin becomes much stronger the faster the ball can be played at stroke spin.
However, the most important prerequisite should always be that playing table tennis should always be fun. Only then can I go home after playing with a whistle on my lips.
Here are the particular physical quantities that may also be associated with "re-impact rackets" among other physical effects. Another factor, for example, is the special physical doctrine of heat in unequal bodies. The smaller the bodies are arranged, the more effective the heat storage. The larger the spaces become, the lower the heat concentration, especially in, for example, table tennis bats.
https://www.deepl.com/translatorhttp://noppentest.de/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 88fdaf2cecthanks, Achim
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
. I had some problems with a long trajectory, need to play more to find out about that. Could be the rubber. I use a medium hard Chineese hybrid rubber, Galaxy/Yinhe Jupiter II. Slightly tacky, medium speed, controlled. 
. Punch blocks are very good as well and you can block passive like with inverted but those blocks are not very difficult for opponent. 