Hi guys, I am new to this forum, so pardon me for a naive question
Can a genuine Acoustic blade weigh 79 g ? (Looks legit to me)
If yes, how would you expect it to differ from a usual +/- 88 g one?
| OOAK Table Tennis Forum https://ooakforum.com/ |
|
| 79 g Acoustic ? https://ooakforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=39466 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Spindoc [ 11 Oct 2022, 08:46 ] |
| Post subject: | 79 g Acoustic ? |
Hi guys, I am new to this forum, so pardon me for a naive question Can a genuine Acoustic blade weigh 79 g ? (Looks legit to me) If yes, how would you expect it to differ from a usual +/- 88 g one? |
|
| Author: | haggisv [ 11 Oct 2022, 20:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 79 g Acoustic ? |
Yes I think it's possible, as there's always variations in weight because wood is a natural product. A lighter one is likely to feel a little slower, but probably a little more control. |
|
| Author: | Spindoc [ 11 Oct 2022, 20:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 79 g Acoustic ? |
haggisv wrote: Yes I think it's possible, as there's always variations in weight because wood is a natural product. A lighter one is likely to feel a little slower, but probably a little more control. Thanks Dark Knight, just a little slower is what I need at my age  I was asking because -9 g seemed to me a bit extreme for a blade that is claimed to be very consistent. Now, I have a pair of Donic Bluefire M3, unpacked. Any idea if it works well with an Acoustic? I hesitate because I don't like overly soft rubbers. Played with YSE/Rasanter R37 for a couple of weeks and it's definitely not my cup of tea. I like G-1 on my Violin, and something similar with the same control but a bit more brushing capability would be perfect. It's hard to play with G-1 topsheet only, but as a drive-spin rubber it's awesome in my limited view. Rakza 7 comes to mind but I never tried it. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|