OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 19 Apr 2024, 21:02


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 08 Jul 2015, 19:10 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 23:45
Posts: 228
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Blade: AfroBro Custom
FH: Rasanter R53
BH: Vega X
radeB wrote:
Are you sure that Ventus Soft and Spin were bouncier?
I have Soft version and it is a rubber with exceptional control.


I'm glad you feel that way. Different people have different ideas on what "control" means though.

But yes, Ventus is bouncier. V>15 Limber is incredibly unbouncy in the low gears - surprisingly so. Note that I'm talking about simple bounce due to incoming speed, not spin. V>15 Limber has a grippier topsheet and is more spin sensitive, so you might find that it reacts more to incoming topspin than the Ventus range. So you might find you have worse control with V>15 Limber, and I might find that I have more control (and I find that I do).


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 08 Jul 2015, 21:24 
Offline
Full member

Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 19:48
Posts: 67
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Thank's :up:
I was thinking of switching to Spin version of the Ventus, and was considering Victas too, but the later two should be heavier and I don't like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 08 Jul 2015, 22:07 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 23:45
Posts: 228
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Blade: AfroBro Custom
FH: Rasanter R53
BH: Vega X
radeB wrote:
Thank's :up:
I was thinking of switching to Spin version of the Ventus, and was considering Victas too, but the later two should be heavier and I don't like that.


Totally right. Ventus is pretty light for a modern rubber, which is becoming a rare quality.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2015, 01:53 
Offline
Full member

Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 03:19
Posts: 89
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time
How does the feeling of grip compare to the Donic Baracuda? What will be the weight approximately of it in 2.0mm?

_________________
Blade: Joola greenline medium
Fh: Stiga mendo 2.0
Bh: Stiga mendo 2.0


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Aug 2015, 09:19 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
Played with the Victas V>15 Limber yesterday night, first table tennis session since two months.
I played (only) three matches with a DHS plastic ball (our club will play with plastic next year) and I was impressed how easy I could adjust from Donic Bluefire JP03 on JSH to V>15 on VKMO. Although I didn't play for a long time, I easily won all three matches (two against +/- equally rated players, one against a higher rated C2 (~USATT 2250)).

I'm not going to repeat what Andy Smith said about the rubber, I can confirm almost everything. The grip is fabulous and control fantastic. It plays maybe even more linear than JP03. I'm glad it's not a soft tensor(-like) rubber of the bouncy or non-lineair kind, like Stiga Calibra Sound or Tibhar Nimbus or even Xiom Yanus. Although my V>15 is in maximal thickness (and my JP03 is 1.8...), I didn't experience less control or disturbing bounciness. But I believe I had a little more power at away from the table loops.

Like JP03, the V>15 isn't very spin sensitive and like Andy said it is a pleasure to play with in the short game. But at the same time a lot of spin and power can be created by engaging the sponge.

Blocking, countering, fishing: it was hard NOT to get the ball on the table :-) (or was it just the plastic?).

In sum: so far, I like the rubber a lot

What I will try to do more next session:

- compare it in detail and side-by-side to JP03
- FH chopping

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Last edited by Pipsy on 20 Aug 2015, 17:53, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Aug 2015, 03:48 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 20:17
Posts: 289
Location: USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 13 times
Pipsy, I'm looking forward to your experience with FH chopping! I have stuck with Xiom Vega Japan 2.0mm for a long time now, but I'm always open to trying something new that comes along.

_________________
Blade: Victas Koji Matsushita FL
FH: Xiom Vega Japan Max
BH: TSP P1-R 1.0mm
USATT Rating: 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Aug 2015, 17:36 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
As expected, FH chopping was more difficult with V>15 than with JP03 1.8, probably because of the max thickness. I had the impression that spin sensitivity was higher, more grip, higher throw. To be continued, cause I just played some matches and didn't chop very much with FH.

I believe Vega Japan has a firmer sponge than V>15, right? All-in-all V>15 is a great all-rounder, in the good sense of the word!

ckhirnigs113 wrote:
Pipsy, I'm looking forward to your experience with FH chopping! I have stuck with Xiom Vega Japan 2.0mm for a long time now, but I'm always open to trying something new that comes along.

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Aug 2015, 18:58 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33351
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2754 times
Been thanked: 1548 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
Pipsy wrote:
As expected, FH chopping was more difficult with V>15 than with JP03 1.8, probably because of the max thickness. I had the impression that spin sensitivity was higher, more grip, higher throw. To be continued, cause I just played some matches and didn't chop very much with FH.

I believe Vega Japan has a firmer sponge than V>15, right? All-in-all V>15 is a great all-rounder, in the good sense of the word!

Yes, I reckon the Vega Japan is a little harder. The V>15 would no doubt be easier for chopping in 1.8mm.

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Aug 2015, 01:55 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 20:17
Posts: 289
Location: USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 13 times
Until somebody tries it in a thinner sponge, and specifically tries FH chopping, I'll just stick to my very controllable Vega Japan 2.0mm.

Pipsy, I can't remember if you ever tried Vega Japan. I find it the most all-around rubber I have ever tried. I am always looking for a rubber that can do all things well (loop, chop, push, smash, lob, etc...). I suppose that's how you feel about the JP03 you use?

_________________
Blade: Victas Koji Matsushita FL
FH: Xiom Vega Japan Max
BH: TSP P1-R 1.0mm
USATT Rating: 2013


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Aug 2015, 17:40 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
The advantage of the max sponge of my V>15 Limber is that it forces me to attack rather than to chop with FH. And I think that's the way to go if I want to survive in the higher division where I start this year.

Vega Japan sounds good but I think it would be a little too hard for my liking. I prefer soft (but not too soft and not too springy) sponges underneath my inverted rubbers. Especially on a hard blade like JSH or VKMO I think they're a great match.

ckhirnigs113 wrote:
Until somebody tries it in a thinner sponge, and specifically tries FH chopping, I'll just stick to my very controllable Vega Japan 2.0mm.

Pipsy, I can't remember if you ever tried Vega Japan. I find it the most all-around rubber I have ever tried. I am always looking for a rubber that can do all things well (loop, chop, push, smash, lob, etc...). I suppose that's how you feel about the JP03 you use?

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 30 Aug 2015, 16:55 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 28 Apr 2012, 17:17
Posts: 26
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time
What are the differences between T05 fx and V15?

Thks!

_________________
Blade: Joo Se Hyuk
FH: Tenergy 05 1.9mm
BH: Curl P1r 1mm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 Sep 2015, 05:39 
Offline
Full member
User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2013, 04:01
Posts: 90
Location: România
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
What are the differences between Victas V>01 Limber and Victas V>15 Limber?
I ask because I really like V>01 Limber.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 28 Sep 2015, 21:19 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
Johnny Erasure wrote:
What are the differences between Victas V>01 Limber and Victas V>15 Limber?
I ask because I really like V>01 Limber.


Johnny, please read the previous posts in this thread. AndySmith made an extensive review of the rubber and also compared it to V>01 Limber. A fragment:

Quote:
I used V>01 Limber for a while on the BH side, and V>15 limber is really different. V>01L seemed almost like an ESN retro throwback to me. At a time when a lot of the ESN range were becoming less flyaway and jumpy, V>01L came along and felt like an old-gen ESN experience (but with a better, grippier topsheet). It was soft, bouncy, loud, fast. I liked it a lot, but it was a bit unpredictable at times (while being a lot of fun).

V>15L is more of a child-of-the-times kind of rubber. Even though it's listed as 40deg, it plays firmer than that. The topsheet has the monster grip you see in current ESN offerings, but feels medium-elastic and predictable. During play it isn't overly bouncy and is very linear in the low/medium gears. Which is just excellent for my BH needs - you get heaps of spin on a brushy shot without a slingy response sending the ball too high. But you get a surprising level of stability on blocks and punches without huge spin sensitivity - I didn't feel like the rubber was washing out on direct shots. On harder shots you do get an extra elastic kick, and it's still a fast rubber overall.


I like the predictability of the V>15 Limber. It's good at all distances, for all strokes (now, how great is that?) and although my sheet is max thickness, I can still chop well with FH when I'm away from the table. I suppose V>01 Limber is bouncier, more dynamic (for optimists) or less predictable (for pessimists)

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2015, 05:07 
Offline
Super User

Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 23:45
Posts: 228
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Blade: AfroBro Custom
FH: Rasanter R53
BH: Vega X
Pipsy wrote:
I like the predictability of the V>15 Limber. It's good at all distances, for all strokes (now, how great is that?) and although my sheet is max thickness, I can still chop well with FH when I'm away from the table. I suppose V>01 Limber is bouncier, more dynamic (for optimists) or less predictable (for pessimists)



Yeah, +1 top description.

I didn't reply to Johnny because I thought he had read my post and wanted other opinions.

I will say this - I used it for a while on my BH but became frustrated at the lack of bounce. I had to play an active stroke all the time, and I've become quite lazy over the years with bouncy BH rubbers. So I switched it to the FH side and boom! Like a dream.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Sep 2015, 08:27 
Offline
Reverse Psychologist
Reverse Psychologist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2011, 02:09
Posts: 1488
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 283 times
Blade: Victas Matsushita Off
FH: Tibhar EL-s 1.9
BH: Victas Curl P1V 1.0
:rock: :rock:

AndySmith wrote:

Yeah, +1 top description.

I didn't reply to Johnny because I thought he had read my post and wanted other opinions.

I will say this - I used it for a while on my BH but became frustrated at the lack of bounce. I had to play an active stroke all the time, and I've become quite lazy over the years with bouncy BH rubbers. So I switched it to the FH side and boom! Like a dream.


Pipsy wrote:
I like the predictability of the V>15 Limber. It's good at all distances, for all strokes (now, how great is that?) and although my sheet is max thickness, I can still chop well with FH when I'm away from the table. I suppose V>01 Limber is bouncier, more dynamic (for optimists) or less predictable (for pessimists)

_________________
Exclusive OOAK-Interview with Joo Saehyuk | Masato Shiono | Panagiotis Gionis


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group