OOAK Table Tennis Forum

Hello,

I just received a Friendship 729 topsheet (white packaging with an eagle), and I see it's not the same as on my old 729-fx rubber.
On the ITTF website, the two topsheet are different :
Super 729 FX : http://www.ittf.com/ittf_equipment/rubb ... s729fx.jpg
RITC 729 : http://www.ittf.com/ittf_equipment/rubb ... tc_729.jpg

So, does someone which one is the best ? which one is the more spinny and sticky ?

Thanks,
Olivier

The 729 sheet was the original, the 729fx came out after. The 729 FX is faster, not sure which is tackier. Note that there are several variants even of the 729FX rubber, where both the sponge and topsheet seem different. For example there is the 729 FX, 729 FX blue sponge, 729 Lighetening, 729 Super soft (i think?) with all the same markings...

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide

SO MANY BASTARD RUBBERS

Those countless bastard offsprings, not payed rubber products by the chinese manufacturer, they all came out a real headache on ITTF. The best possible solution would be enacting "identity marks" on the sponge underlayer. Again, codification of the production date will be utterly pertinent as part of the identity mark.