OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 20 Apr 2024, 15:15


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 339 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 23  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 17 Sep 2013, 19:37 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33351
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2754 times
Been thanked: 1548 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
This is a great thread... thought I might give a little bump, see if we can think of any new ones. ;)

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 18 Sep 2013, 00:38 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2011, 05:18
Posts: 889
Location: The (Un)ited States
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 12 times
Blade: Appelgren Allplay
FH: Mark V GPS 2.0
BH: Reflectoid 2.0
Foot stamping. Can I do it? I'm not doing it with the intent to disrupt the opponent, it just happens.

_________________
Happy Holidays 'round the world!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Sep 2013, 02:16 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2009, 04:45
Posts: 534
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 32 times
VeganPlayer wrote:
Hi all. I was an empire, and we empires are kidding about the most strange cases.

A very weird case is this:

What happens if a ball remains stopped on a net post in a middle of a point?

What do you think? (It was happed once at least). :lol:


Yes, very odd. It argues for the design of net gear without flat upper surfaces.

That said, whoever it was who last struck the ball loses the point because he or she has failed to make the ball touch the opponent's court which is a fundamental requirement of a legal return. No legal return (or serve) means you lose the point.

_________________
Jay Turberville
http://www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist & Dr. Evil


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Sep 2013, 08:01 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33351
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2754 times
Been thanked: 1548 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
THE GAMEr wrote:
Foot stamping. Can I do it? I'm not doing it with the intent to disrupt the opponent, it just happens.

There is no rule against it, but if the umpire deems it's disruptive to the game, even if that is not your intent, you can still get warning and lose points if it continues. I've never seen this happen though.

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Sep 2013, 08:06 
Offline
Bytes worse than his Bark
Bytes worse than his Bark
User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2011, 12:25
Posts: 1692
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 375 times
Blade: OldNittaku Carbon
FH: Tenergy 05 Hard
BH: Yasaka Shining Dragon max
Quote:
VeganPlayer wrote:
Hi all. I was an empire, and we empires are kidding about the most strange cases.

A very weird case is this:

What happens if a ball remains stopped on a net post in a middle of a point?

What do you think? (It was happed once at least). :lol:


Quote:
wturber said:
Yes, very odd. It argues for the design of net gear without flat upper surfaces.

That said, whoever it was who last struck the ball loses the point because he or she has failed to make the ball touch the opponent's court which is a fundamental requirement of a legal return. No legal return (or serve) means you lose the point.


I don't believe that the point has finished yet as, after hitting the net / net assembly, the ball has not:
hit the table;
hit anything other than the table.

So as I have posted before, I as the umpire would go and nudge the net assembly until the ball comes off it, and then call a let for outside interference, whether the ball dropped on to the table or the floor. I would then give myself a yellow card :)

_________________
Retriever (sometimes golden, but often leaden)
Moderator, Inverted Retriever Technique sub-forum - http://ooakforum.com/viewforum.php?f=74


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Sep 2013, 08:47 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2009, 04:45
Posts: 534
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 32 times
Retriever wrote:
Quote:
VeganPlayer wrote:
Hi all. I was an empire, and we empires are kidding about the most strange cases.

A very weird case is this:

What happens if a ball remains stopped on a net post in a middle of a point?

What do you think? (It was happed once at least). :lol:


Quote:
wturber said:
Yes, very odd. It argues for the design of net gear without flat upper surfaces.

That said, whoever it was who last struck the ball loses the point because he or she has failed to make the ball touch the opponent's court which is a fundamental requirement of a legal return. No legal return (or serve) means you lose the point.


I don't believe that the point has finished yet as, after hitting the net / net assembly, the ball has not:
hit the table;
hit anything other than the table.


Right. But there is no rule that says it has to hit something else for the point to end. It merely has to fail to contact the opponent's court. Once the ball becomes motionless and has not contacted the opponent's court, it is obvious that the player has failed to make a correct return (2.7.1 not satisfied) and the umpire awards a point based on 2.10.1.2.

2.7 THE RETURN
2.7.1 The ball, having been served or returned, shall be struck so that it passes
over or around the net assembly and touches the opponent's court, either directly or after touching the net assembly.

2.10 A POINT
2.10.1 Unless the rally is a let, a player shall score a point
2.10.1.1 if an opponent fails to make a correct service;
2.10.1.2 if an opponent fails to make a correct return;




Retriever wrote:
So as I have posted before, I as the umpire would go and nudge the net assembly until the ball comes off it, and then call a let for outside interference, whether the ball dropped on to the table or the floor. I would then give myself a yellow card :)


Yes, a funny notion. But not necessary.

_________________
Jay Turberville
http://www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist & Dr. Evil


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2013, 15:54 
Offline
Roar Talent
Roar Talent
User avatar

Joined: 03 Mar 2011, 17:59
Posts: 1519
Location: Philippines
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 43 times
Blade: Tiago Apolonia ZLC
FH: Rhyzer 50
BH: Donic Acuda Blue P3
I would agree with turber on this one. The ball is already motionless.

_________________
Enjoy the game. It is a never ending learning experience once you play and keep the ball on that 45 sq ft of space or should I say half of that space.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2013, 04:44 
Offline
Senior member

Joined: 20 Dec 2012, 07:57
Posts: 192
Location: Tennessee, USA
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 30 times
Nebur wrote:
my left hand always follows the movement of the ball a bit after I throw it up. It doesn't conceal the ball in any way for the opponent, but it does follow the balls trajectory a bit, which might give the impression I don't throw it high up enough.

Is there any rule on this? Should I somehow keep my left hand steady or away. I know it's illegal to conceal the ball in anyway too but it's not the case. Nobody ever had a problem with the way I do my fast serve before


I have a similar serve, a serve I'm noted for in my playing circles. It's basically just a fast no spin or light topspin serve from my BH corner. I then direct the serve to the opponent's BH Corner, BH sideline, FH corner, or elbow. It's actually one of my best serves.

When I toss the ball up, my toss hand is directly in front of my body. After the ball leaves my hand, I then turn my toss hand sideways and follow the ball upward so my toss hand and ball are at about the same height for at least the first few inches of the toss. But my hand never follows the ball all the way to the top of the toss.

The only time I've been called on that serve was when I was in the finals and had an umpire who was trying to qualify for the next higher level of umpire certification. He called me for obstructing his view of the serve (Rule 2.6.6) claiming that my toss hand kept him from observing the ball toss (my toss hand would be between him and the ball). He even called me once when I was on the opposite side which meant that my toss hand was on the opposite side of the ball from the umpire!

I would argue that the umpire could see the toss as the ball leaves my open hand, beginning its upward ascent before I move my hand sideways and then raise it with the rising ball. He could then observe the ball above my toss hand to determine if the toss was 6 inches or not. So IMO, I'm not doing anything that would prevent him from seeing that the toss started by leaving my open hand or that the ball didn't travel the required 6 inches. And I certainly can't see any justification for calling that when I'm on the opposite side where the umpire has a clear view of the ball throughout the service motion. I think I just got a picky umpire that was trying to prove his worth.

Larry


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2013, 07:25 
Offline
Super User
User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2009, 04:45
Posts: 534
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 32 times
larrythoman wrote:
I would argue that the umpire could see the toss as the ball leaves my open hand, beginning its upward ascent before I move my hand sideways and then raise it with the rising ball. He could then observe the ball above my toss hand to determine if the toss was 6 inches or not. So IMO, I'm not doing anything that would prevent him from seeing that the toss started by leaving my open hand or that the ball didn't travel the required 6 inches. And I certainly can't see any justification for calling that when I'm on the opposite side where the umpire has a clear view of the ball throughout the service motion. I think I just got a picky umpire that was trying to prove his worth.

Larry


I agree. It seems like that umpire didn't understand the rules.

I serve primarily from my backhand and have had people tell me at times that I don't toss high enough. But I've looked at video, and I easily toss eight or more inches routinely. I think the fact that I too tend to follow the ball up and down with my hand and my body gives a visual impression of a lower toss.

_________________
Jay Turberville
http://www.jayandwanda.com
Hardbat: Nittaku Resist & Dr. Evil


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2013, 05:53 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 17 Nov 2013, 05:02
Posts: 7
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
I've returned to table tennis (social only at the moment) last year and had a 30 year gap and have a few questions. :)

When you throw the ball and fail to hit the ball ;) - is that a point for the receiver?
When you serve the ball and it hits the line/side of the table (receiver's end) - is that a fault?
When you serve the ball and it hits the line/end of table (receiver's end) - is that a fault?

Hope you can help. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2013, 06:29 
Offline
Do you feel lucky (young) punk?
Do you feel lucky (young) punk?
User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 12:57
Posts: 5772
Location: USA
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 248 times
Blade: Juic Hinoki One Ply
FH: Tibhar 5Q
BH: Scandal
The serve begins with the toss so if you do not hit it, point for the receiver.
Hitting the side line or end line is a good serve. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2013, 07:00 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 17 Nov 2013, 05:02
Posts: 7
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Thanks. And if the ball hits the line/edge of table?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 17 Nov 2013, 08:12 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33351
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2754 times
Been thanked: 1548 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
spinspin wrote:
Thanks. And if the ball hits the line/edge of table?

Then it's an excellent point, especially if you can do it consistently! :clap:

So yes it's definitely a valid serve if it hits the lines or edges. Only if it hits the net on serve (and only on serve) it is a 'let' and you need to serve again (as many times as it takes and you lose no points for this).

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 18 Nov 2013, 22:24 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 17 Nov 2013, 05:02
Posts: 7
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
haggisv wrote:

So yes it's definitely a valid serve if it hits the lines or edges. Only if it hits the net on serve (and only on serve) it is a 'let' and you need to serve again (as many times as it takes and you lose no points for this).


Thanks again. Two more small questions. If your opponent plays a ball that you can't return but it accidentaly hits your bat (before it falls to the ground) is that a point for the opponent?

My second question is about the serve. I saw some pictures on a website about how to hold your hand. I understand your hand on which you place the ball needs to be flat and the ball needs to be on your palm, but does the thumb also need to stick out? Or is that small detail not important?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Nov 2013, 22:54 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 17 Nov 2013, 05:02
Posts: 7
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time
spinspin wrote:

Thanks again. Two more small questions. If your opponent plays a ball that you can't return but it accidentaly hits your bat (before it falls to the ground) is that a point for the opponent?

My second question is about the serve. I saw some pictures on a website about how to hold your hand. I understand your hand on which you place the ball needs to be flat and the ball needs to be on your palm, but does the thumb also need to stick out? Or is that small detail not important?


Does anyone have the answers for me. I know they're only small questions but it would be good to know.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 339 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 23  Next



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group