OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 18:15


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 914 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 61  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 20 May 2009, 16:49 
Offline
The Artist
The Artist
User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 00:31
Posts: 1504
Location: An islet off the European Coast
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times
Debater wrote:
The difference with the Globe Trotters was that you knew who was going to win before it started - it was just a case of how they got there. At least with Adham's suggestion the winner will not be known before the start.

True, but the point of the show was not that you knew who was going to win, but the spectacular display of skills and talent. But I agree, it is much better not to know who will win. It adds to the atmosphere of the event.

Debater wrote:
Brabhamista, I had to smile when you said
Quote:
[SNIP] Too much cricket for a table tennis thread, I am afraid.

And then a few lines later wrote,
Quote:
Test cricket and the IPL league have two different organising bodies,....

even if the second quote was in the context of a table tennis comparison. :wink:


Hey! I am only human, you know ;)

Now, let's bring fattchoi over here for some hardbatting :P

_________________
NITTAKU SEPTEAR cpen | FH: 729 802, 1.5, black | RPB: CORNILLEAU PILOT POWER, 2.0, red
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: 21 May 2009, 03:06 
Offline
Modern Chiseler.
Modern Chiseler.
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 06:49
Posts: 11148
Location: USA
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 578 times
Blade: WRM Gokushu2
FH: S&T Secret Flow 1mm
BH: S&T Monkey ox
Why doesn't the ITTF promote a world hardbat championship? That would be interesting as it virtually eliminates the current day atmosphere of people trying to beat the system with an equipment advantage. As Debater said "talent will always win out," plus people love to play it and watch it. Maybe table tennis needs to embrace its roots more.

There's the argument that a sponge/inverted player will beat a hardbat player. There's also an argument that an MMA fighter will beat a boxer. But people still like boxing and they still like hardbat. If you're looking for something that is easy to understand and follow, hardbat is it.

_________________



The MNNB Blog has had some pretty amazing stuff lately. Just click this text to check it out.
| My OOAK Interview
Table Tennis Video Links: itTV | laola1.tv | ttbl | fftt | Challenger Series | mnnb-tv

My whole set-up costs less than a sheet of Butterfly Dignics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 May 2009, 09:46 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33353
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2760 times
Been thanked: 1550 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
Adham

Can you explain a little about FIT?
http://www.tt-manufacturers.com/home.htm

Is this run by the ITTF, or completely independent?
What purpose does it serve?
Do manufacturers pay to become members?

Thank you!

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 May 2009, 10:45 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
haggisv wrote:
Adham

Can you explain a little about FIT?
http://www.tt-manufacturers.com/home.htm

Is this run by the ITTF, or completely independent?
What purpose does it serve?
Do manufacturers pay to become members?

Thank you!


FIT is completely independent from the ITTF. It is an association of table tennis manufacturers and wholesalers. Its purpose is to act as a service organization to its members and to act as a lobby group to the ITTF. They meet once or twice a year and discuss all issues related to equipment. They make recommendations to the ITTF through the Equipment Committee and they also do research on behalf of their members. I do not think that there is a fee to join. Their Executive Committee meets regularly with the ITTF's equipment committee to discuss equipment issues. Sometimes they invite me to their meetings to ask questions or to make suggestions, or even to complain about some ITTF matters. I try to cooperate with FIT as much as possible, but keeping in mind that some of our objectives are different, while some are the same.By the way, not all manufacturers are members of FIT.

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 May 2009, 12:30 
Offline
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2006, 12:34
Posts: 33353
Location: Adelaide, AU
Has thanked: 2760 times
Been thanked: 1550 times
Blade: Trinity Carbon
FH: Victas VS > 401
BH: Dr N Troublemaker OX
Thank you Adham!

Yes it's curious why some manufacturers would not want to be members... if there are no fees, what's the downside? Perhaps they simply cannot see the benefit...

_________________
OOAK Table Tennis Shop | Re-Impact Blades | Butterfly Table Tennis bats
Setup1: Re-Impact Smart, Viper OX, Victas VS 401 Setup2: Re-Impact Barath, Dtecs OX, TSP Triple Spin Chop 1.0mm Setup3: Re-Impact Dark Knight, Hellfire OX, 999 Turbo
Recent Articles: Butterfly Tenergy Alternatives | Tenergy Rubbers Compared | Re-Impact User Guide


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 25 May 2009, 23:53 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
haggisv wrote:
Thank you Adham!

Yes it's curious why some manufacturers would not want to be members... if there are no fees, what's the downside? Perhaps they simply cannot see the benefit...


FIT is very useful to the ITTF. We make many decisions together, especially the FEES that we charge for authorization and approval of equipment. We also share our research findings with FIT. I do not know why some manufacturers are not members, it is in their interest to be informed, to have peer-group support, and to be readily informed. I asked one non-member manufacturer this question, and the answer was "Because we are not obliged to join". Go figure !!

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 May 2009, 02:40 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
speedplay wrote:
Wrote this after some good thinking but didn't get any replies... :cry: Now, I don't want to bug you about it, if you don't feel like answering, I'll accept that, but I quote it here in case you simple missed it. Especially interested in your view about the third point I made.

speedplay wrote:
Having re-read this entire thread, searching for some facts about Tensors that I thought was here, I found a couple of things I would like to bring up again, as tehy weren't answered before.

1: First thing, well, it was answered, but no more news about it, Grand Slams of Table Tennis, how is this progressing? Is there any GS in the foreseeable future? I think this would really help making the sport more popular.

2: I suggested something along the lines of the Ryder Cup of Golf, were Europe plays against USA, what about bringing this concept in to TT, seeing no single nation is even close to post a threat to China, how about bringing the top 10 players in the world (excluding China, off course) to play against the top 10 players of China? Or, would this only show us exactly how dominant China are, as there would be a great risk of China winning such an event with out losing any match at all?

My suggestion of how it should be, to make it at least a bit competitive:

World no 1 & 2 against China no 9 & 10, player 1 faces both player 9 & 10 in a single game, the same goes for player 2, and then they face each other in a double.

World no 3 & 4 against China no 7 & 8, same format, and so on.

This would give a format of 5 two vs two matches and scores could be kept either by counting each single win (maximum 5-0 at one "set") or a single point awarded to the team who wins the "set", could be 3-2 or 5-0, the winning team would still only get one point.

The reason I suggested this way of play is because I think this would make it more even then if it was worlds 1 & 2 against China 1 & 2 and so on.

Is this something that ITTF could consider? I think it would be great as it would show all the best players in the world and I actually think that the format I suggested would make it quite interesting.

3: Reading up about rule changes and the desire to bring more defenders to the higher level. The facts here contradicts each other, since rule changes that are supported by a big majority is rather easy to pull through, but it is almost impossible to do it the other way around. Now, since most players/coaches wants the rules to suit them and the style they use, then how can we, defensive players, ever get a rule change that works in our favour? We are a minority amongst the players and we need to trust the government body (ITTF) to look after us and our needs. We won't get our NA behind us, cause most players are offensive players and looks for benefits for their style and a lot of them actually wants to ban everything except for pure inverted rubbers. Now, how should we as a minority act to get support? This is, according to me, ITTF's job to make sure that the defensive style is given a platform to work of, with rules that actually help us fighting the battle against the loopers and hitters out there, cause if ITTF don't do this, then the defensive style will soon be gone as all further rule changes, based on majority decision, will be in favour of the attacker since there simply put are a lot more of them.

Adham, what's you view on this and is the ITTF doing anything at all to help defenders stay in the game?

Sorry for having missed these questions.

1. It is still in the works, hopefully in 2010 as a modification to the current Pro Tour. It would not be called GS, but something else more appropriate to our sport. Stay tuned.

2. This already exists. We have a China vs World match every year. This year it will be next month in Shanghai and will include both Men and Women. The next step is to take this challenge match out of China and into other countries, but alternate every second year in China.

3. The ITTF cannot make rules for or against any particular style. The fact that there are few defending players in my opinion stems from coaching and not from rules. If there were an equal number of defensive players as there are attacking players the results would also be balanced. If you look at the women international players, you will find more successful defensive players just because there are more of them. So, in my opinion the "coaching" mentality has to change. Most coaches, especially outside of Asia, do not know how to develop a defensive player, so they take the easy way out and teach the attacking style that they know well. The rules are not the problem, coaching is the issue. The ITTF cannot tell the coaches how to coach, but we try to influence the associations and in general the coaches to pay more attention to the defensive style for a better balance and because it's a beautiful style to watch and a great part of our heritage.

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 May 2009, 03:01 
Offline
Modern Chiseler.
Modern Chiseler.
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 06:49
Posts: 11148
Location: USA
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 578 times
Blade: WRM Gokushu2
FH: S&T Secret Flow 1mm
BH: S&T Monkey ox
adham wrote:
The ITTF cannot make rules for or against any particular style.

Not specific rules. However a consistent workaround toward this end is that equipment has been banned and/or changed so that the net effect is to cripple certain defensive styles which are considered "deceptive," supposedly require "less skill," or are not considered attractive for TV. The deck is now stacked in favor of top-spinners.

_________________



The MNNB Blog has had some pretty amazing stuff lately. Just click this text to check it out.
| My OOAK Interview
Table Tennis Video Links: itTV | laola1.tv | ttbl | fftt | Challenger Series | mnnb-tv

My whole set-up costs less than a sheet of Butterfly Dignics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 May 2009, 06:22 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
mynamenotbob wrote:
adham wrote:
The ITTF cannot make rules for or against any particular style.

Not specific rules. However a consistent workaround toward this end is that equipment has been banned and/or changed so that the net effect is to cripple certain defensive styles which are considered "deceptive," supposedly require "less skill," or are not considered attractive for TV. The deck is now stacked in favor of top-spinners.


You see, the main problem is that I, and many others, do not agree with this premise at all. To say that equipment would help the defensive player is a fallacy. What you are saying is that at lower levels a player using some specific type of equipment with long pimples, or low friction pimples has a better chance against other players at that level. Perhaps that is true at that level. But are these really "defending" players? Can they return balls from both sides 6, 7 or 8 times when attacked? The core of the problem comes from the lack of coaching knowledge at the early stages to develop solid "traditional and modern" defensive players. It has nothing to do with equipment. Why are you not saying that with the removal of the so-called speed glue we are favouring defensive players? In fact, equipment has nothing to do with it. If you develop 20 players and 10 of them are defensive, they will have an equal chance. But if you develop 100 players and one of them only is defensive, and his coach does not really know how to teach him the real defense, then of course you will not get top defensive players. I hope you understand what I mean.

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 26 May 2009, 23:12 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 09:24
Posts: 1362
Location: Universe
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 103 times
YOUTH HEALF ISSUE IN RUSSIA.

Adham
For me, the most vital issue of todays is to prevent our young players from using the home-brewed organic glues, most injurious to healf.
Here, in Russia. we still have over 20,000 youngsters going on with various speed glues. !2-17 y.o.players are still taking a daily "glue inhalation" in the many of municipal sport centres and tt-clubs.
For now, the ENEZ control is only established for the Russian`s SuperLeague matches. (some 150 pro-players envolved).
For money reason, only 5 ENEZ boxes were distributed down to the regional Associations. (65 active branch-associaions throuthout Russia).

We need an affordable testing instrument to fight the harmful glues at club level.
]ELIZE machine seems to meet the case well enough/.
Mr, President
Let us know, please, all the circumstances regarding the device.
How to buy it? How to operate? WASSING did not response as yet.

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 May 2009, 00:52 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
igorponger wrote:
YOUTH HEALF ISSUE IN RUSSIA.

Adham
For me, the most vital issue of todays is to prevent our young players from using the home-brewed organic glues, most injurious to healf.
Here, in Russia. we still have over 20,000 youngsters going on with various speed glues. !2-17 y.o.players are still taking a daily "glue inhalation" in the many of municipal sport centres and tt-clubs.
For now, the ENEZ control is only established for the Russian`s SuperLeague matches. (some 150 pro-players envolved).
For money reason, only 5 ENEZ boxes were distributed down to the regional Associations. (65 active branch-associaions throuthout Russia).

We need an affordable testing instrument to fight the harmful glues at club level.
]ELIZE machine seems to meet the case well enough/.
Mr, President
Let us know, please, all the circumstances regarding the device.
How to buy it? How to operate? WASSING did not response as yet.

Thanks.


The Elize device has been used at the Qatar Open and at the World TTC in Yokohama on an experimental basis. It is not yet ready for mass use (clubs, associations, coaches and players).

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 May 2009, 05:12 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
It seems like I screwed up in my response above. Could the administrator delete the two above responses and then I will post again my response as a separate reply. Thanks.

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 May 2009, 05:13 
Offline
King of Ping!

Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 00:17
Posts: 487
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Defensive players: I completely disagree with you assessment, but let's just leave it to that and agree to disagree. I have my views and you have yours. Mine are based on coaching and yours are based on equipment, so we could never agree.

China vs World: These are official matches that count for Ranking. The next one is in Shanghai on 7-8 June following the China Open.

GS: Yes, I hope it works well, we are making presentations to sponsors at this time. But for your information the ITTF Pro Tour already enjoys a lot of TV coverage in different parts of the World. Also starting next month we hope to have ALL Pro Tour events live and free on itTV.

Statistics: Please go to the ITTF website and look at the pull-down menu "Ranking & Stats" and select "Statistics". You will have many results and statistics available for you to explore. If you want to know the results between 2 players against each other, go to the "Pro Tour" pull-down" menu and click on "Head to Head" and then enter the names of the 2 players. Viola. Knock yourself out. I have done the Ma Lin vs Wang Liqin for you :

Tour Player 1 Player 2 Date Event Time Rnd Result Winner
Qatar Open 2009 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 2/21/2009 MS 1/1/1900 12:00:00 PM 4 0 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
World Table Tennis Championships 2009 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 5/4/2009 MS 5:15:00 PM 4 4 - 3 WANG Liqin (CHN)
Volkswagen Open - Japan 2008 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 5/25/2008 MS 1/1/1900 12:15:00 PM 4 1 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
Volkswagen Open - China 2008 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 5/18/2008 MS 12:15:00 PM 4 4 - 3 WANG Liqin (CHN)
ERKE Qatar Open 2008 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 3/22/2008 MS 1/1/1900 12:15:00 PM 4 0 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
Tournament of Champions 2007 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 10/22/2007 MS 3:35:00 PM 4 2 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
LIEBHERR German Open 2007 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 11/11/2007 12:15:00 PM MS 11/11/2007 12:15:00 PM 4 1 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
World Table Tennis Championships 2007 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 5/27/2007 MS 4:00:00 PM 2 4 - 3 WANG Liqin (CHN)
Qatar Open 2007 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 2/17/2007 MS 5:15:00 PM 2 2 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
JAPAN Open 2006 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 9/24/2006 MS 1/1/1900 11:30:00 AM 4 4 - 3 WANG Liqin (CHN)
Volkswagen Open (China) 2006 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 6/18/2006 MS 1/1/1900 4:15:00 PM 2 0 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
QATAR Open 2006 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 2/17/2006 MS 6:15:00 PM 2 4 - 2 WANG Liqin (CHN)
World Table Tennis Championships 2005 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 6/5/2005 MS 9:00:00 PM 2 4 - 2 WANG Liqin (CHN)
QATAR Open 2005 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 2/25/2005 MS 6:15:00 PM 2 4 - 1 WANG Liqin (CHN)
Pro Tour Grand Finals 2004 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 12/12/2004 MS 9:00:00 PM 2 4 - 1 WANG Liqin (CHN)
CHINA Open 2004 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 9/12/2004 MS 11:30:00 AM 4 1 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
SINGAPORE Open 2004 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 5/30/2004 MS 6:30:00 PM 2 4 - 1 WANG Liqin (CHN)
Olympic Games 2008 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 8/23/2008 MS 11:00:00 AM 4 2 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
GERMAN Open 2003 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 11/9/2003 MS 3:30:00 PM 2 4 - 1 WANG Liqin (CHN)
CHINA Open 2003 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 9/14/2003 MS 11:30:00 AM 4 3 - 4 MA Lin (CHN)
CHINA Open 2001 WANG Liqin (CHN) MA Lin (CHN) 6/9/2001 MS 5:30:00 PM 2 3 - 2 WANG Liqin (CHN)

© Copyright 2002 - International Table Tennis Federation (ITTF)
Webmaster: [email protected]

_________________
Adham Sharara


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 May 2009, 05:40 
Offline
Modern Chiseler.
Modern Chiseler.
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 06:49
Posts: 11148
Location: USA
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 578 times
Blade: WRM Gokushu2
FH: S&T Secret Flow 1mm
BH: S&T Monkey ox
I think the reason there are very few defensive coaches these days is because the last decade seems to many to be a systematic assault by the ITTF against tactical players who use long pips.

In 1998, the aspect ratio was reduced from 1.3 to 1.1 and resulted in a ban of 12 of the most popular chopping rubbers. In 2000, the ball size was increased to 40mm which hurt long pip players a lot by significantly reducing the spin we had to work with. In 2002, the density limit of pimpled rubber was reduced from 50/sq. cm to 30/sq. cm. stifling innovation. In 2008, a minimum friction requirement was added resulting in approximately 30 popular low friction pimpled rubbers being banned. In 2009, the most popular "frictionless replacement" rubbers from TTMaster were banned primarily because of one complaint letter from a disgruntled player.

To keep diversity in the game and move toward leveling the playing field between defenders and offensive players (offenders :lol:), I think the aspect ratio should at a minimum be returned to 1.3 to compensate for the bigger ball, and the maximum pip density and minimum friction requirements should be removed.

You have stated that you would like to bring defense back to the game. These moves would help make that happen.

_________________



The MNNB Blog has had some pretty amazing stuff lately. Just click this text to check it out.
| My OOAK Interview
Table Tennis Video Links: itTV | laola1.tv | ttbl | fftt | Challenger Series | mnnb-tv

My whole set-up costs less than a sheet of Butterfly Dignics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 27 May 2009, 08:01 
Offline
Pop and Swirl
Pop and Swirl
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jun 2007, 19:22
Posts: 3519
Location: Philippines
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times
Hi Speedplay, perhaps some examples of which particular statistical information you would like to see during the broadcast?

I, for one, would like to see the playing style and rubbers used in the match, aside from the win-loss statistic and age, perhaps.

_________________
Viscaria. H2 Neo 2.15. Tenergy 05 1.9.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 914 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 61  Next



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group