OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 23:29


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fastarc confusion
PostPosted: 09 May 2023, 04:26 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 03 May 2023, 23:26
Posts: 12
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Blade: Tibhar Stratus Power Wood
FH: Nittaku Fastarc G-1 max
BH: Nittaku Fastarc C-1 2.0
I'm having some trouble understanding the fastarc lineup. Overall I've heard mostly good things. However I see lots of people use the G-1 on the fh, while many others use it on the backhand.

I've seen it compared to the tenergy series, G1 to 05 and S1 to 64. The arc graphs for both confirm this, where 05 and G1 have the highest arcs while 64 and S1 have the lowest.

Both T05 and T64 are regarded as good bh rubbers, however as far as I know 64 is better in that position. Would that mean that a G1 forehand and S1 backhand would be a good combination? Or perhaps a Nittaku Hurricane FH with a Fastarc Bh? Or maybe some other hybrid forehand?

What is it usually combined with?


Top
 Profile  
 


 Post subject: Re: Fastarc confusion
PostPosted: 09 May 2023, 19:14 
Offline
New Member

Joined: 03 May 2023, 23:26
Posts: 12
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Blade: Tibhar Stratus Power Wood
FH: Nittaku Fastarc G-1 max
BH: Nittaku Fastarc C-1 2.0
I noticed a prevalence in recommendations of G-1 for the forehand while the Bh is split between C-1 and S-1.
According to some sales stats tho C-1 has been in the top 3-5 selling rubbers in Asia consistently over the last several years while S-1 barely makes the cut some months. G-1 is an immovable first place, with Rozena being a permanent second.
What's your experience with S1 C1 and the nowhere to be found P1?

Also read great reviews on Factive as BH rubber. Opinions on it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fastarc confusion
PostPosted: 16 May 2023, 18:49 
Offline
Hurricane Lover
Hurricane Lover
User avatar

Joined: 09 Mar 2008, 19:19
Posts: 2940
Location: Indonesia
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 242 times
Blade: DHS Long 2
FH: Dianchi D
BH: Yinhe Pluto
One of my sparring partners use both G1 for FH and BH.

_________________
instagram: rokphishtt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fastarc confusion
PostPosted: 16 May 2023, 20:03 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 09:24
Posts: 1362
Location: Universe
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 103 times
Mima Ito seems absolutely satisfied with G1 for years.
https://youtu.be/E_aafx5mWSU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fastarc confusion
PostPosted: 16 May 2023, 23:14 
Offline
OOAK Super User
OOAK Super User
User avatar

Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 04:40
Posts: 1647
Location: Texas, USA
Has thanked: 344 times
Been thanked: 106 times
Blade: Tibhar Force Pro SE
FH: Razka XX max, black
BH: LP OX, Monkey/SavigaV
Our club players that use it use G1. I have tried G1 and P1, but really didn't notice much of a difference. Never seen C1


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 




All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 238 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group