OOAK Table Tennis Forum


A truly International Table Tennis Community for both Defensive and Offensive styles!
OOAK Forum Links About OOAK Table Tennis Forum OOAK Forum Memory
It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 17:09


Don't want to see any advertising? Become a member and login, and you'll never see an ad again!



All times are UTC + 9:30 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Sriver G3
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2009, 11:16 
Offline
Pop and Swirl
Pop and Swirl
User avatar

Joined: 08 Jun 2007, 19:22
Posts: 3519
Location: Philippines
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times
I have tried Sriver L 2.1 on a Sardius blade of a friend, felt like it was fairly great for the backhand. So I talked to my dealer to provide me with sheets of Sriver, she returned with sheets of Sriver FX! Come playtime, I wanted to get something similar to Sriver, so I asked her what she had on stock...Sriver G3 in 2.1mm, she says. And so, intrigued by the claims of 'no more fresh gluing for Sriver', I hesitantly ( :lol: ) bought a sheet of Sriver G3, along with the promise of exchanging the Sriver FX for Sriver L in the near future. (Now, both are in my hands)

Image
Image

Image
Image

So what is the difference (first impression) of the Sriver G3 and the classic Sriver?

I recall Der_Echte posting his translation of a Korean review of the Sriver G3 (excellent work there, Der!). The guy there was pretty right on the money, with most of the characteristics of Sriver retained with a little bump up on the speed and spin department.

G3 is a fairly good short-to-mid-distance rubber with a medium throw angle. Has a more supple topsheet and a softer-feeling sponge than the classic Sriver. May be similar to Sriver with one to two coats of glue on it, with some play time in it to 'break-in' the topsheet and sponge.

Classic Sriver (L) has tough-feeling topsheet, with the difference to Sriver G3 much similar to an unglued Chinese sheet and a Chinese sheet reglued around two to three times. I reckon the classic Sriver is more hardy and requires less care and maintenance than the G3. It would also survive a table-edge attack in much better shape.

The pip size, shape, and spacing are fairly similar to the two variants. I think the difference lies in the material makeup in these two topsheets. The sponge of them both are similar as well.

It might look like a Butterfly scam (it's said to be so); it's not revolutionary as the Tenergy series, but it does deliver what it has promised: 'glue feeling Sriver'. They didn't mention that it was a light gluing feeling, however. Heavy gluers should perhaps look to either boost this rubber or look for alternatives.

_________________
Viscaria. H2 Neo 2.15. Tenergy 05 1.9.


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: Sriver G3
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2009, 15:16 
Offline
Hurricane Lover
Hurricane Lover
User avatar

Joined: 09 Mar 2008, 19:19
Posts: 2940
Location: Indonesia
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 242 times
Blade: DHS Long 2
FH: Dianchi D
BH: Yinhe Pluto
sorry can't give you much input... but i've tried L, G3, and i still like EL for the backhand... I'd only tried L & G3 for a very short while though... both were mine but i let them go quite fast...

_________________
instagram: rokphishtt


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 




All times are UTC + 9:30 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 292 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Copyright 2018 OOAK Table Tennis Forum. The information on this site cannot be reused without written permission.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group