BRS wrote:
Seriously nice bh, and really good serves. And when those two things are working you will win a lot of games.
Thanks BRS.
wilkinru wrote:
Brave Sir Mickd posting videos of matches...if only others would. You know who you are.
Also very good stuff all around from your play. You get a ton of value from the dead serve here. Lets you do the famous forehand practice. The backhand is also really solid - I wish I could return long serves that well with my backhand. I'm always looking for a forehand.
The last point was really nice. You did everything there you've been working on + attacked his counter from your opener flick.
Thanks Russ. The BH opening against serves is something that I've only started to get more confident with recently. I used to play basically all FH.
chopblock wrote:
@mick, very well played, especially taking the last two points on his serve with well-constructed rallies!
You are not as bad at matchplay as you suggested
Thanks chopblock. I'm going to post one more set soon... against a different guy... This time I only take like 3 or 4 points because I just can't return his serves well and my FH/BH were both really inconsistent. That's what I meant by the bad match play haha. Against this opponent, he makes everyone feels like they're playing well.
NextLevel wrote:
Well played but since everyone has said the good stuff I will have a different focus.
You probably have the cleanest and most straightforward lefty game. I have ever seen. And that is not a good thing. I think in general that you need to develop more aggressive plays, placements,footwork and serves and take more advantage of your athleticism. Your opponent is a good player no doubt but I got the impression that you were willing to work hard for every point and weren't trying to make him move per se. You are a lefty so people should be scared of the angles you can create with your Backhand and forehand and serves. You have a lot of untapped potential in there. I suspect that is partly. because like me you are so used to drilling for rallies. You have to do some drilling for devastation as well. Even if you make your training partner defend only half the table.
Thanks NL. He was definitely playing at like 60% whereas I was trying much harder. It's true about over drilling for rallies. Having like 60% of my play time just blocking and rallying so others can practice attacking, 35% doing drills like that for myself, and less than 5% playing matches is definitely the reason why the balls I hit are just like practice balls. And this is an issue I've been working on a lot recently. I need better angles and placement, which I'm slowly... very slowly.. working on.
wilkinru wrote:
I shall also add, I think there were more forehands to be had there. Just needed to take a little step to your left and attack.
I'm not tired yet so let's get into it...
@0:16 you serve, get ready and then jump again - why? only to have the ball come back to your backhand, then he counters it to your forehand.
@0:39 the second shot was a forehand. Pivoting a little would have bought you the time.
@0:51 same as @0:39. Second shot was a forehand.
You had a lot of great points after that, near the end you had one where you did pivot even.
The bouncing to the forehand after the serve probably needs to just go away. Jamming you on the backhand would be highly successful, as happened at 0:16.
I would have liked to have seen more forehand loops against backspin, just didn't happen this game. I'm starting to think your backhand is stronger against backspin and this is why your jumping to the middle of the table to cover up the forehand.
Thanks for more detail! I had a look at all the places you mentioned and I've also given it some thought. I'm actually not sure why I jump again to the middle after every serve. I'll try it without next time and see how it feels. I think I know why it has become like that, but I agree that it's probably not the best thing to do. Since a long time ago, I always consciously tried to do this: move after every shot, move again before every shot. So I'll hit a ball, move once, then move again in position to hit the next ball, then move again, then move into position to hit the next ball. I've generally tried to do something similar after serve too. Serve, move to the ready position, then move into position for the next ball. I seem to have made my ready position in this case the middle of the table, but I should have the ready position as where I move my feet right after the serve, which is generally a more FH dominate stance. Interestingly, my receive stance is also in the middle of the table. I guess that's just where I'm most comfortable to take any ball from.
For the balls at 0:39 and 0:51, I can't say why I did that. I agree I should have taken it on my FH. My body just did everything automatically. I don't know how bad it would be if I actually moved properly and took the ball well with my BH, but I didn't. I think ideally in my head, I would go for a FH there. A video that zeio linked awhile back on myTT also had the Chinese women's national coach (I think it was) explain why you should always take balls to the middle with your FH. But so many people nowadays, generally females who play closer to the table, take those balls with their BH instead. I do wonder if this is a technical flaw or if both are acceptable for different players.
Your comment about my BH opener against underspin being stronger is an interesting one. I think my stance and recent incline to use my BH to open more gives off that impression. But my FH is still actually much stronger haha. I can't quantify it but by feel, I'd dare say maybe even twice as strong. Against heavy pushes, I don't think my BH is able to lift it at all, so it's all FH. But you are what you practice and I've been practicing significantly more BH than FH recently because I want to balance my game. And I think a lot of my improvement recently has been because people can no longer just push into my BH and have me guaranteed just to push it back. Same with if they played to my BH, I used to just passively block it back.
The TLDR version of that is just I need to remind myself to use more FH
Brett Clarke wrote:
Great game Mick!
I like the all the shots and it's good to see someone able to implement the things they've been training.
For the serve, rock back onto your left straight leg on the ball toss before stamping onto the right. Here's an example, though it's the opposite because he's right handed. Watch what he does with his back leg. He puts it back, straightens it and put all of his weight onto it. Then he stamps straight down on to the front foot.
Your friend that you beat in the game does the right thing with his legs on the serve.
Thanks Brett. I've never considered this and it seems like something easy I can try and add. I'll work on it
People have been complimenting my serve recently, but it seems really split. Some people say it's horrible, and some say it's really good. All I know is that it's far, far, FAR from perfect.
My opponent actually gave me some advice on the serve. He said I need to work on the toss. When my toss was consistent, the serve had good quality. But my toss was all over the place. So whenever he saw my toss looked inconsistent, he knew the quality of the serve was going to be low. He said I should think about tossing the ball with my legs. Using the bending and unbending of the knees to power the toss instead of over-relying on the arm. That would increase the consistency. I actually thought this was really good advice. And to be honest, I've never heard anyone describe the toss like that. Having the legs bend and unbend to power it.
Thinking about it now, I feel like that approach would also create what you recommended me to try with the straightening of the leg too.